IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] OSPF Link Overload - draft-hegde-ospf-link-overload-01

Pushpasis Sarkar <psarkar@juniper.net> Mon, 28 September 2015 05:46 UTC

Return-Path: <psarkar@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37BF91A88BA for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 22:46:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BJk9sMhLiKKo for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 22:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2on0137.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.100.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4BD9E1A8895 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 22:46:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from BLUPR05MB1969.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.23) by BLUPR05MB1970.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.280.20; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 05:46:15 +0000
Received: from BLUPR05MB1969.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.23]) by BLUPR05MB1969.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.23]) with mapi id 15.01.0280.017; Mon, 28 Sep 2015 05:46:15 +0000
From: Pushpasis Sarkar <psarkar@juniper.net>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] OSPF Link Overload - draft-hegde-ospf-link-overload-01
Thread-Index: AQHQ+bD9FUA0cHLM8Uynrv/k8TfdlQ==
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 05:46:15 +0000
Message-ID: <4758E85F-1591-4761-BF54-73331B0C5D3F@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/0.0.0.150911
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=psarkar@juniper.net;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [116.197.184.11]
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR05MB1970; 5:X9AV0Vvou1R1JgJ7nOmarOV7JpFakhQ8pkqNehTW1TSNeaJ6HoT6SQCvFydUxfhLHXZTvQwzcHSNKjU1s7w7GUJSSpKm3mqju7r1FTqK4OC7m1rNGv7H93Um0EejyxcxmZVQdgBnouFAmqtjB+pBKw==; 24:Jm+QU+us3ImO0GqiXl0UeUthdzA1lNMOBB5v6MtyKtt+z0GwHa1AJM0usT5lv3A9Wy81Y037PzLZ9Bx3ulp9Zd/4jchOJWvXEXg2xFaz4gE=; 20:eRXROAHxKCG0+EjBP8Q8MVq/xqQJvNBzVKy5DCpRfHNLKWslybQudGM1F9kNyElp/2t9Y26+J7qklFDyq0QHqg==
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB1970;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR05MB19705057EF0B3C9639C6A624BC4F0@BLUPR05MB1970.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(95692535739014);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(520078)(8121501046)(3002001); SRVR:BLUPR05MB1970; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR05MB1970;
x-forefront-prvs: 0713BC207F
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(164054003)(199003)(24454002)(479174004)(377454003)(189002)(11100500001)(40100003)(10400500002)(106116001)(54356999)(50986999)(107886002)(105586002)(5001830100001)(97736004)(19580405001)(68736005)(5001860100001)(4001350100001)(19580395003)(5001770100001)(4001540100001)(5001960100002)(189998001)(81156007)(46102003)(122556002)(106356001)(15975445007)(77096005)(5004730100002)(5007970100001)(77156002)(36756003)(92566002)(102836002)(2900100001)(62966003)(66066001)(64706001)(101416001)(83506001)(82746002)(87936001)(33656002)(5002640100001)(99286002)(86362001)(83716003)(230783001)(104396002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB1970; H:BLUPR05MB1969.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <1AC38F2A18404D43847482D699BAB24A@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 28 Sep 2015 05:46:15.3762 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR05MB1970
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/oLvHGSgDC2L3xnX-bVv6cSwGV14>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF Link Overload - draft-hegde-ospf-link-overload-01
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2015 05:46:20 -0000

Support as co-author.

Thanks and Regards,
-Pushpasis



On 9/26/15, 6:04 AM, "OSPF on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)" <ospf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of acee@cisco.com> wrote:

>In Prague, there was consensus in the room that this use case was not
>covered by existing mechanisms and that it was a problem the WG should
>solve. There were differing opinions as to the exact solution but that
>should not preclude OSPF WG adoption.
>
>Please indicate your support (or concerns) for adopting this as a WG
>Document. 
>
>
>Thanks,
>Acee 
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>OSPF mailing list
>OSPF@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email