IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] IPR Poll "OSPF Link Overload"

Mohan Nanduri <mohan.nanduri@gmail.com> Mon, 23 October 2017 05:21 UTC

Return-Path: <mohan.nanduri@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30D813D929; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 22:21:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id funXbPSB0VOi; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 22:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pg0-x22f.google.com (mail-pg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6FB3113D927; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 22:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pg0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id r25so10888977pgn.4; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 22:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=message-id:mime-version:to:cc:from:subject:date:importance :in-reply-to:references; bh=65TwU1w/hvPGldigAtCLwHy/jV8x3pLol+p9skJY0u4=; b=DClZPv9WQH2OD3gvuOsa+8lD7ERHXy8gJJmFB3LjcqXGQlEb0sCzAkcu1zbGXlutnO eqQy01V7SOXwxojommpL9+/l9KcHv2YK15IchhUpqX88BHQCKVeEPN9AraKW5Fyn/aYL K9iiL+n2aCIrGk7W2WR+FzIlMdXXfe6yR35ev1IQZuKHnulnj2J0ssJKlorA7+rC08nS butHW9e1aUoyeODiM1scIvn7Hie3F4zpaAeABoqhtYbu7XD2mL/7if1le/dH8fzlgkYX rR1Qn7wHIKPVH9Sikl7WQaOi4cerJ0NCJXvbEi3FC69J6kFqeBbIxSkfKZYI2UuEWAz5 ntrg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:mime-version:to:cc:from:subject:date :importance:in-reply-to:references; bh=65TwU1w/hvPGldigAtCLwHy/jV8x3pLol+p9skJY0u4=; b=Lo2tIaIazdQ7hEMG++DF3VFMr3YUHzewmES9NcFthaqDoGfBB7Z8ETTz5jWJVkx5jb GtX1t2b84rsi8QgBmSRfqg0cOllyhATXY1P79OSs19hV9wF1IYRBrb4q+vKIGHK9M27X alOOReq/pWomjLn48q9WyUOioG9hUV1RCWR0H5V8DeKbnu/WPXjzQpL9lE/04EUXoyMK fldvuYQ1vE0xC4Zy7u68vULCiSFWNXxe+2EaHp/nBOuLGIas26wonr1i8ngdY5W8J9cc V3eWY3nrVy8Q+PVfzxwUZBKVWlSAL1QitXksvGzjMuQBO0k6lh5pKWJY9f2ZNonQkVxA AlBA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXPHYBaUIhXbyICalOtaoH88vtiLDf4n1JmYDH1ThJtIJorB78x Mi22mvtPl/WzIpB3nsydSeg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+RNiwNY2pCsZ2RElgPO+so5lXOE43zgKPA4kFXLYtsI9WwGGXcXA72Qe6MGXzCAcer8aaI0Nw==
X-Received: by 10.159.195.69 with SMTP id z5mr7130524pln.183.1508736098025; Sun, 22 Oct 2017 22:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:::ffff:10.243.120.84? ([49.39.252.143]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d7sm10306426pgf.20.2017.10.22.22.21.33 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 22 Oct 2017 22:21:36 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <59ed7c60.07a7630a.361fe.ae4a@mx.google.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Hannes Gredler <hannes@gredler.at>, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org>
From: Mohan Nanduri <mohan.nanduri@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 10:51:29 +0530
Importance: normal
X-Priority: 3
In-Reply-To: <1BA78B10-3B9B-4893-8E51-CE73C135B700@gredler.at>
References: <D6110F24.D0DEE%acee@cisco.com> <1BA78B10-3B9B-4893-8E51-CE73C135B700@gredler.at>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_F0A83E7D-DB3D-4DAC-A738-73994D13AB06_"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/olnqbcAd0umrx4Ui9PCgB4GJRMM>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] IPR Poll "OSPF Link Overload"
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 05:21:40 -0000


I am not aware of any IPR other than declared by Juniper.

Cheers,
Mohan

Sent from my Windows 10 phone

From: Hannes Gredler
Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2017 3:10 PM
To: Acee Lindem (acee)
Cc: OSPF WG List; draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OSPF] IPR Poll "OSPF Link Overload"

not aware of invention disclosure / patents beyond junipers. /hannes

> On 21 Oct 2017, at 20:50, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Authors,
> 
> Please indicate whether you are aware of any relevant IPR and if so,
> whether it has been disclosed.
> 
> The following IPR has been disclosed: 
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload
> 
> Thanks,
> Acee
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status