Re: [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions

"Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <dirk.goethals@nokia.com> Mon, 02 October 2017 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <dirk.goethals@nokia.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD6E134824 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 12:59:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 03QsdjaOYq-e for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 12:58:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-ve1eur01on0111.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.1.111]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE1D0134825 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 12:58:58 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nokia.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-nokia-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=vF6G6qS5+RnzSPF4PQGMsYaj58C/N4Ib6+2Oka/KiZ0=; b=ruu/w2NRdSjdwx3+eWScpxQpD+lHk/nYkcMW0NYLKBmjEZtDUG0JlGgVQFsqdpYkM9DL4ugLUUzktkymTHEK0Y8L6ik03ebxrigkfx7oO3/ypvYWo69LMlj9kSU5lXNVhIf4ocBnUO4mqKwZhIMdy5m03qYoXYSghfSy3s2nd7I=
Received: from AMSPR07MB100.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.90.27) by AMSPR07MB098.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.242.90.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.77.5; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 19:58:56 +0000
Received: from AMSPR07MB100.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::25ad:bb3b:709f:3df9]) by AMSPR07MB100.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::25ad:bb3b:709f:3df9%14]) with mapi id 15.20.0077.016; Mon, 2 Oct 2017 19:58:56 +0000
From: "Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <dirk.goethals@nokia.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
CC: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions
Thread-Index: AQHTLJPlOv4ME1m3G0uoeI6j6a+fAaLQ5d+AgAAyu6k=
Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 19:58:56 +0000
Message-ID: <AMSPR07MB1005D6BB5A01BB19640E974E27D0@AMSPR07MB100.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <00091bae-e9ac-ed07-d7f9-ac18c45d565f@nokia.com> <59D286DA.5080205@cisco.com>,<D5F7FF31.CA93E%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D5F7FF31.CA93E%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: nl-BE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [168.63.110.130]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; AMSPR07MB098; 6:bxBTE59Kd+I7tK3hl0F0f4lshOy+4EGmK/8t1/b1aXVmCswHfS0o9zU47zHFGqRnx0GQ15oQt9SxvgVLrl+7HROVa3PyDz/njIG+LkrjNU//fJ2MmPlKe1k5fymd4D8WoNAS4yWO0IqVL0JE/O60jl9jS8WFT2g1RGDtjtnJLogRY52RKup6uZRRTvw6HxDER+KBPFmSfP5+aTM72+hfOfGrjNCUwAScfQo6oTXtVVxlpx8Tfx6xoYdMqH4IUwO9oxlkD8xkji7h9uFqkPtMuWLc1F9TyFgN3IqbxAlL/jS2xUlfjmCeZ5I+kq6CrdDwx3dLZprTTShU7Ef1IfXhZQ==; 5:BbtP/eC3m8bdzztc+HkzzqXHK5dSwDcPzH64gdPOGVvvjffsn/XDdM5Wnoo2eeZHtBi8IB9rFQNiXDbMTZH7q/dkGBPm8c7eIUWl8OphW1XWbWPzeydw1zE9q5PJzPL5bmg+4i+AeCUvQob4Zz/sig==; 24:YwBH2RcxkCdeWJ3k+ueLn0/LuiTeSrGhY/YnGVWju5nxJ2LdXBceer+HndOVXny36oMgddfhD1QnQVSjaR7suf+JK37/OOdeNJGHi/tNol4=; 7:DdvuzEYYqZ/wssxCmmvORAI66GbhIbf3n+Q2Qposg75NaxsybSvSXr02Og7qhQ1D72xaWSDZV59w6dQVIUpLkYsVWuhyeGsU0OTVxMeYNLDRNygx0hIS6CEDuWPM7O5BxEgZ8TL50nG8mkrdLXy3fDT7rXKoJWXZ83/Ybv6uuV13u8rQQuDcK2MQVmfHDF/vc2bUV+GXMdBH8CdQ0M0Tn93lEDY367PpXwi9R1Wfl9w=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 79ee0e59-ee1b-4848-80db-08d509d003d5
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(2017030254152)(48565401081)(2017052603199)(201703131423075)(201703031133081)(201702281549075); SRVR:AMSPR07MB098;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AMSPR07MB098:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=dirk.goethals@nokia.com;
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(158342451672863)(82608151540597)(211936372134217)(95692535739014)(153496737603132);
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AMSPR07MB098C27408F127F198D7A69AE27D0@AMSPR07MB098.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000700101)(100105000095)(100000701101)(100105300095)(100000702101)(100105100095)(6040450)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(12181511122)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(10201501046)(100000703101)(100105400095)(920507026)(6055026)(6041248)(201703131423075)(201702281528075)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123560025)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(20161123558100)(20161123555025)(6072148)(201708071742011)(100000704101)(100105200095)(100000705101)(100105500095); SRVR:AMSPR07MB098; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(100000800101)(100110000095)(100000801101)(100110300095)(100000802101)(100110100095)(100000803101)(100110400095)(100000804101)(100110200095)(100000805101)(100110500095); SRVR:AMSPR07MB098;
x-forefront-prvs: 0448A97BF2
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(376002)(39860400002)(346002)(377454003)(199003)(189002)(13464003)(53936002)(14454004)(189998001)(2950100002)(6916009)(101416001)(6246003)(99286003)(9686003)(34040400001)(33656002)(7696004)(66066001)(53546010)(3280700002)(55016002)(106356001)(5660300001)(105586002)(54896002)(74316002)(5250100002)(7736002)(25786009)(3660700001)(2900100001)(230783001)(68736007)(4326008)(478600001)(102836003)(3846002)(6116002)(81166006)(2906002)(81156014)(8936002)(54356999)(229853002)(316002)(8676002)(97736004)(76176999)(50986999)(6506006)(86362001)(6436002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:AMSPR07MB098; H:AMSPR07MB100.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: nokia.com does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_AMSPR07MB1005D6BB5A01BB19640E974E27D0AMSPR07MB100eurprd_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: nokia.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 02 Oct 2017 19:58:56.3245 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5d471751-9675-428d-917b-70f44f9630b0
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AMSPR07MB098
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/omjWfmDY6KKUMKxZQ5h1T0eE-A8>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 19:59:01 -0000

Ok.
Thx,
Dirk
________________________________
From: Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com>
Sent: Monday, October 2, 2017 8:45:41 PM
To: Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
Cc: OSPF WG List
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions

Hi Dirk,

I agree we should use the same term but we have finished WG last call and
AD review for the OSPFv2 Segment Routing extensions. Additionally,
everyone is familiar with the term link-group. A link-set would be new
terminology. Let’s fix the IS-IS draft.

Thanks,
Acee
>
>
>
>-------- Original Message --------
>Subject:        draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions
>Resent-Date:    Wed, 13 Sep 2017 06:26:45 -0700
>Resent-From:    <alias-bounces@ietf.org>
>Resent-To:      <ppsenak@cisco.com>om>, <stefano@previdi.net>et>,
><cfilsfil@cisco.com>o.com>, <hannes@rtbrick.com>om>, <robjs@google.com>om>,
><wim.henderickx@nokia.com>a.com>, <jefftant.ietf@gmail.com>
>Date:   Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:26:47 +0200
>From:   Dirk Goethals <dirk.goethals@nokia.com>
>To:     <draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org>rg>,
><draft-ietf-isis-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org>f.org>,
>"draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org"
><draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org>
>
>
>
>Hi authors,
>
>OSPF's G-flag and ISIS's S-flag are both representing adjacency sets,
>see snip below,
>can we align these definitions and simply call it S-Flag in both IGPs.
>
>Thx,
>Dirk
>
>OSPFv2 and OSPFv3:
>
>           The G-Flag.  Group Flag.  When set, the G-Flag indicates that
>           the Adj-SID refers to a set of adjacencies (and therefore MAY
>           be assigned to other adjacencies as well).
>
>
>
>ISIS:
>
>           S-Flag.  Set flag.  When set, the S-Flag indicates that the
>           Adj-SID refers to a set of adjacencies (and therefore MAY be
>           assigned to other adjacencies as well).
>
>.
>
>