Re: [OSPF] draft-ppsenak-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse

Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> Thu, 30 March 2017 19:19 UTC

Return-Path: <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0945412778D for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:19:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZtOQ3y1vqNjn for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:19:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x232.google.com (mail-wr0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B06C5126C3D for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x232.google.com with SMTP id w11so73472890wrc.3 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=itQ+v4TKXm2qgbPgskZf/dclytyeUziOyy079zqg0lk=; b=Hwdi7ycpJcr0jcQp3CNGPQJ7uhpEhnSKsokle4YZnAIpWW55tlq35Cbqc7xv9R0Cr8 QmldHHu2Mg6i6RYrqHoRjJltuazte4xc6tYqtygJpr5VvE9jSfu6ftcW5KD3YEdT3JKx KU2975mJiUq3SsmbcGSpqWIUq4iiIVlq/K04/hY+1p/WpDhVj9iib5EZIsJvo92oNy9t p6pfP4iIBa2YlZCDzK7nroBHoYzTuNP/x2vddrqmdxwnAd9cbrRv9/+HD1lbR4wlIp9P iH4JvpvHWeI2D2+GN17PJY7rBFhNKFVIdddArUgcUt1cy2Xo+L7/GHgjbTRQ6WfT/mT6 hZ0w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=itQ+v4TKXm2qgbPgskZf/dclytyeUziOyy079zqg0lk=; b=QCmaRei6u3Rim3wj4Cg6Y2ik2j5Ru2PpZlG43332f2ooWzqQ5xzhCLmCuF4qHri4ro g1QV1BxUYPghAlW/TF6UBSmOCfLrRRI9hwPySSiaeSrY7CKG/1bZyUzQNkNbC1IiRxAy UvNglSMQ4ZXO4MLxCYnzlKFfJKwApKfq8iQrP/yLdZ9RhGCxZ+aPmqIRySVlMI82ZcN0 NxVqq4yGSENdazfDZC7gyucEAQlGoQ/xl/rwufay8l4gTY7Z1C6vxtrQ8fHbveo3U9e/ sFV033jzcehYkn55Rexl1zaKCSTFjYf+7yg0Li7/ZivYk+kfPizBvzj83aVnJ5RRzTmE rwkQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3BSegikQpmZmY0Hf3qRseWAYJd1shGfT3DrUL8er2Z87RtlzNarcCVsQuFd6p88gRVx0sTi8J2+gK5Xg==
X-Received: by 10.223.139.30 with SMTP id n30mr1284970wra.86.1490901593942; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.145.68 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 12:19:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+b+ER=+UNUtzamduonsTs3WkZsadSCCa_-6dMb6DCvwyTMDRQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CA+b+ERkC4h4FY8zrFwbED-hWcQ8YkCOa_zfya6J50pOmSBnFiA@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERm3vebcL2ft_g4870uRN9S_VkXR_-JAWdqueQsPGyFhQQ@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=KwTOcwsvuoBoD3eim7dkMgSfUtdX-z6B2dU9dmP0aeg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERkKj=VKNSLW=A_gurMZtZ-sFtvHZdB8r1mTTz77LOcWBg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERnrVPJyw8RmvD6+3td2eE2q4KZ4-LkcVxL9pk9Km0EK=A@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ERmdFbg_cFjysHQwkLY-+i1ERL9u+hEeVThStkhEi9gYxw@mail.gmail.com> <CA+b+ER=+UNUtzamduonsTs3WkZsadSCCa_-6dMb6DCvwyTMDRQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 15:19:53 -0400
Message-ID: <CAG4d1rdKUd7VgoVq9hRhbaGAmoY9qX_KJh8teEqVTkFPHMVfNQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="f403045eb26ee6f5cb054bf79370"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/oo8zxRrKywOIDJQIsAUZqL3nZEc>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] draft-ppsenak-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 19:19:58 -0000

Robert,

Take a read through RFC 7282.  Consensus calls aren't about majority rules.
It is about hearing technical objections and understanding and responding
to them.
It is quite quite clear that there are technical objections to either
solution.

Regards,
Alia

On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Based on the discussion so far I see that:
>
> A) producing use case document will only delay things further as each use
> case presented will be questioned as possible already today via MTR, MI,
> building new separate network etc ...
>
> B) WG members in majority support adoption of draft-ppsenak-ospf-te-link-attr-reuse.
> Can we get at least sense in the room who is in support of which draft ?
>
> Thx,
> R.
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>
>