Re: optimization of Opaque LSA
Jean Philippe Vasseur <jvasseur@CISCO.COM> Thu, 29 July 2004 01:53 UTC
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id VAA22141 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:53:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (209.119.0.2) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <19.00E2C99A@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:53:44 -0400
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 28041460 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:53:43 -0400
Received: from 171.71.176.71 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:53:43 -0400
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com (171.71.177.254) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Jul 2004 18:56:56 -0700
Received: from wells.cisco.com (wells.cisco.com [171.71.177.223]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i6T1reCv002520 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:53:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jvasseur-w2k01.cisco.com (che-vpn-cluster-1-7.cisco.com [10.86.240.7]) by wells.cisco.com (8.8.6 (PHNE_14041)/CISCO.SERVER.1.2) with ESMTP id SAA15806; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 18:53:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender: jvasseur@wells.cisco.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2
References: <BAY15-F39ezf9CIElR300063f83@hotmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Message-ID: <4.3.2.7.2.20040728215321.05b35e88@wells.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 21:53:37 -0400
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Jean Philippe Vasseur <jvasseur@CISCO.COM>
Subject: Re: optimization of Opaque LSA
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: <0fe201c4744a$3c15f390$0202a8c0@aceeinspiron>
Precedence: list
Hi Acee, At 10:26 PM 7/27/2004 -0400, Acee Lindem wrote: >Hi Shahid, > >I haven't heard any requirement to shrink the OSPF TE LSAs. agree JP. >One thing >to consider is the fact that OSPF TE (RFC 3630) is already a draft >standard and is widely deployed. > >Thanks, >Acee > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "shahid nawaz" <shahid_optical@HOTMAIL.COM> >To: <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM> >Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 2:22 PM >Subject: optimization of Opaque LSA > > > > Can Any body tell me that Is there any work on the optimization opaque LSA. > > Like the unreserved bandwidth has 32 octet, 4 octet for reservable, 4 for > > maximum available bandwidth. if Anyone knows please tell me. because i have > > an idea of optimization of opaque LSA. > > > > thakyou very much indeed > > > > from shahid nawaz > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. > > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
- optimization of Opaque LSA shahid nawaz
- Re: optimization of Opaque LSA Acee Lindem
- Re: optimization of Opaque LSA Jean Philippe Vasseur