Re: what is the fundamental difference between OSPF and IS-IS?

Arthur Dimitrelis <arthurd@ARC.CORP.MOT.COM> Fri, 23 August 2002 00:08 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA14286 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 20:08:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <16.006E69D8@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 20:09:56 -0400
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 89969 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 20:09:56 -0400
Received: from 144.189.100.102 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0f) with TCP; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 20:09:55 -0400
Received: [from pobox4.mot.com (pobox4.mot.com [10.64.251.243]) by motgate4.mot.com (motgate4 2.1) with ESMTP id RAA17628 for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 17:09:54 -0700 (MST)]
Received: [from homer.arc.corp.mot.com (homer.arc.corp.mot.com [10.238.80.38]) by pobox4.mot.com (MOT-pobox4 2.0) with ESMTP id RAA28907 for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 17:09:52 -0700 (MST)]
Received: from arc.corp.mot.com (arthurd.arc.corp.mot.com [10.238.80.59]) by homer.arc.corp.mot.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g7N09o7C026347 for <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>; Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:09:50 +1000 (EST)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <B036F14C7A7FD511827000805FFEA8AD0C9EA1@eee-fs7.bham.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <3D657D4D.852EE417@arc.corp.mot.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:09:49 +1000
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: Arthur Dimitrelis <arthurd@ARC.CORP.MOT.COM>
Subject: Re: what is the fundamental difference between OSPF and IS-IS?
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

there is a paper by Radia Perlman that answers your question, entitled "A
Comparison Between Two Routing Protocols: OSPF and IS-IS". It appeared in the
September 1991 issue of the IEEE Network Magazine. Contact me off list if you
need help finding it (it's freely available in electronic form).

cheers,
Arthur

"Liu B." wrote:

> Hello everyone,
>
> Thanks for answering my previous questions. I am reading RFC 1142 (OSI IS-IS
> Intra-domain Routing Protocol), in order to compare OSPF with IS-IS. There
> are so many common things between two of them, such as area routing, virtual
> link, designated router ... what is the fundamental difference (or
> improvement?) between OSPF and IS-IS?
>
> Thanks again for all your helps.
>
> Bin Liu