IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for "Advertising per-node administrative tags in OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-02

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 20 August 2015 23:50 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8FC1A21A2 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:50:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O4vQEr-_rBZE for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 647671A21A1 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 16:50:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1926; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1440114645; x=1441324245; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=DfawiK1yFLekdaEaOYUibgNtdSXZPbC0A2dUctx0l9c=; b=DBeHfi/howIlUOcGTNUTIGY4Jizvr2fM29ToxWnaZ268k3bzzcYRcQg1 yE/Tp25MY3syVoKhl+RpOi4+8sS2gQquVQWQRrA778JWponiM2vVYC+f7 7FCX06SMcH+SM6jmLMil6ybY0JkTc2EaZQIxZfYl7Q8kliXn60flVQLKf U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0C9AgAOZ9ZV/5xdJa1dgxtUWw4GvVEBCYFtCoV7HoEiOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEJAEBBAEBARoGETodAQgaAh8HAgQlCxUSBAESiC4NuXGWEwEBAQEBBQEBAQEBAQEXBIEiijGEV4MjgUMFlSkBjG6BSoQukFqDaSaCP4E+cYFIgQQBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,717,1432598400"; d="scan'208";a="180719789"
Received: from rcdn-core-5.cisco.com ([173.37.93.156]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 20 Aug 2015 23:50:44 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (xch-aln-013.cisco.com [173.36.7.23]) by rcdn-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t7KNoigH021729 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 23:50:44 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-013.cisco.com (173.36.7.23) by XCH-ALN-013.cisco.com (173.36.7.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 18:50:43 -0500
Received: from xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com (173.37.183.76) by xch-aln-013.cisco.com (173.36.7.23) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5 via Frontend Transport; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 18:50:43 -0500
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.223]) by xhc-rcd-x02.cisco.com ([173.37.183.76]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Thu, 20 Aug 2015 18:50:43 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for "Advertising per-node administrative tags in OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-02
Thread-Index: AQHQ26MGa9ehpQr4i0KdnsfAH4wZDA==
Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 23:50:42 +0000
Message-ID: <D1FBD8CF.2C429%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [173.37.102.24]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <C8185BC9FB7ABC479FA0DA196D0CD56E@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/pthPdEw4dnzspj5v4ztJgskx7VU>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for "Advertising per-node administrative tags in OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-02
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2015 23:50:46 -0000

Authors, 

In the “Elements of Procedure” section, please address how multiple
instances of the TLV will be handled. At a minimum, the following cases
must be handled:

     1. Multiple instances of the TLV in the same OSPF(v3) Router
Information LSA
     2. Multiple instances of the TLV in multiple OSPF(v3) Router
Information LSA instances
     3. Removal an instance of the TLV in an OSPF(v3) Router Information
LSA through re-origination
     4. Purge of an OSPF(v3) Router Information LSA containing the node
admin tags TLV. 

One possible interpretation (and probably the simplest) is that the set of
valid tags for a given OSPF(v3) router is the superset of the tags in all
the existing OSPF(v3) Router Information LSAs advertised by that router.

Thanks,
Acee  
  





On 7/23/15, 2:24 PM, "OSPF on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)"
<ospf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of acee@cisco.com> wrote:

>This begins the WG last call for the subject draft. Please send your
>comments to this list prior to 12:00 AM GMT, August 22th, 2015. Note that
>we are doing a 4 week WG last call due to the volume of IETF WG last calls
>made this week and the fact that many WG participants may be taking
>vacation in August.
>
>Thanks,
>Acee
>
>_______________________________________________
>OSPF mailing list
>OSPF@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email