[OSPF] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig-12: (with COMMENT)

["Barry Leiba" <[e-mail]>]

Barry Leiba has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig-12: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'll note that the RFC Editor will move Section 1.2 to the end.  If
there's a reason you don't want that, you should let them know.

-- Section 10 --

   This specification also creates a registry for OSPFv3 Auto-
   Configuration (AC) LSA TLVs.  This registry should be placed in the
   existing OSPFv3 IANA registry, and new values can be allocated via
   IETF Consensus or IESG Approval.

The current term is "IETF Review" (not "IETF Consensus"), and you should
have a normative reference to RFC 5226 here.  It would also be good to
say when IESG Approval is an appropriate alternative to IETF Review.