Re: [OSPF] Some enquiries about OSPFv3 Auto-Configuration Internet Draft

Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com> Sun, 27 January 2013 20:50 UTC

Return-Path: <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0F4021F8794 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 12:50:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.58
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.58 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.587, BAYES_00=-2.599, DEAR_SOMETHING=1.605, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6dLI1NbvvEG9 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 12:50:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usevmg21.ericsson.net (usevmg21.ericsson.net [198.24.6.65]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57FF421F8816 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 12:50:52 -0800 (PST)
X-AuditID: c6180641-b7f926d000000e79-81-5105932a5e23
Received: from EUSAAHC007.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [147.117.188.93]) by usevmg21.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 1A.BB.03705.A2395015; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 21:50:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from EUSAAMB101.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.118]) by EUSAAHC007.ericsson.se ([147.117.188.93]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Sun, 27 Jan 2013 15:50:50 -0500
From: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
To: sarah boufelja <boufelja.sarah@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: Some enquiries about OSPFv3 Auto-Configuration Internet Draft
Thread-Index: AQHN/MVnJd4LLteczkalS/Q6N6MngJhd+j2A
Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 20:50:49 +0000
Message-ID: <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE470B0DAA@eusaamb101.ericsson.se>
References: <CAOoVDGv_k7UPu6q+3tbC1Q0Kt8VGaiNu3vPkrEN51erhpG925A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAOoVDGv_k7UPu6q+3tbC1Q0Kt8VGaiNu3vPkrEN51erhpG925A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [147.117.188.134]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE470B0DAAeusaamb101ericsso_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrILMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyuXRPrK7WZNZAg9afuhYPu9ewW7Tcu8fu wOSxc9Zddo8lS34yBTBFcdmkpOZklqUW6dslcGX83NrNXvBVu+La2ntMDYxHVboYOTkkBEwk Hm77zQ5hi0lcuLeerYuRi0NI4AijRNuq21DOckaJl99fM4JUsQnoSDx/9I8ZxBYR0JXoXncc LM4sICvxbFsTWFxYwEvizO+ZUDXeEvO3/WaBsI0kfrz+ARZnEVCVmHpkOpDNwcELVLP5CViJ kECAxJGXXWAlnAKBEpd/Lgcbzwh03PdTa5ggVolL3HoynwniaAGJJXvOM0PYohIvH/9jhbCV JZY82c8CUZ8vcaf/B5jNKyAocXLmE5YJjKKzkIyahaRsFpIyiLiOxILdn9ggbG2JZQtfM8PY Zw48huq1luj+O4URWc0CRo5VjBylxalluelGhpsYgdF2TILNcQfjgk+WhxilOViUxHlDXS8E CAmkJ5akZqemFqQWxReV5qQWH2Jk4uCUamCsY/Rsb5BKkV79OvJr4LY431er/DtycrLYUhcl Lj/Y0XQh67ev76kwp6LugsXz/TWDtB/MWnVOTLw/j2/j9P2foz5FnVr8xm+HmBvnIWHd1OXp lZIX7108eNPxJ3vQPKskgV0TJNul3vOYzn/z2v7eIRe2fx227hFxL3INp3pPVI2/edXWYoUS S3FGoqEWc1FxIgC/FmD2hAIAAA==
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Some enquiries about OSPFv3 Auto-Configuration Internet Draft
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2013 20:50:53 -0000

Hi Sarah (OSPF List copied),

See inline.

On Jan 27, 2013, at 2:34 PM, sarah boufelja wrote:


Dear Sir, I am a engineering student at Telecom Bretagne, a french graduate school and a research center in communications and computer science. I am studying in my project routing protocols and I found an Internet-draft that has been written by you and Mr. Jari Arkko about OSPFv3 auto-configuration. I am interested in this subject and I have some questions concerning the draft. I would be really thankful if you enlightened me:

1- My first question concerns the part 5.4 in the draft (Change to received self-originated LSA processing): it's written that the router, when it detects that some instances of its self-originated LSA are purged or reflooded, it's an indication of a possible router-ID duplication and it must delay self-originated LSA processing for LSA that have recently been purged or reflooded for ten seconds and an exponential back-off of 1 to 8 seconds for the processing delay. I don't really figure out this specification, what about the AC -LSA, isn't sufficient to detect and resolve any duplication ID issue?

Possibly the AC-LSA isn't the first LSA to be received by the router joining the OSPFv3 routing domain with the same OSPFv3 Router-ID as another router in the same domain. Hence, this is to mitigate any flooding wars until the OSPFv3 routers realize that a duplicate router-id condition exists.


2- Concerning the IPv6 global addresses, the specifications introduced the AC-LSA that can be used in the future to carry some additional information about global IPv6 prefixes, can we envisage for instance to use this LSA to do a stateless autoconfiguration by giving the router a prefix to construct  a global unicast address without any human intervention?

There is a draft proposing just this in the HOMENET WG.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-arkko-homenet-prefix-assignment/


Thank you very much in advance for your help.

Thanks,
Acee




Cordially.