[OSPF] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-14.txt

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 13 April 2017 21:25 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B65C1296C9 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 14:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aruggB6IDFJ1 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 14:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FE231200DF for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 14:25:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=3392; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1492118717; x=1493328317; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: content-id:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=eDYNLkjDl8jY6TGILUtoEz2gU4yn+ZNhfqgdS8UCMfQ=; b=HPptUiiyv8HwET3xpv7kaOlICVZsAJng5aq5pVfV/XBWO5Y1owqZAeZX fiH0Y1055hWv7XycV6wmS0fuTTyF+eJfE+TmUd3zRgldtkwNovEJx7in8 AEnAPX32Ccvr2zIJ3GJc2LxkpFwyNqwpTfx0WAz52Rshf3Mwu0TNVDq6M U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,195,1488844800"; d="scan'208";a="411452408"
Received: from alln-core-5.cisco.com ([]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 13 Apr 2017 21:25:16 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (xch-rtp-015.cisco.com []) by alln-core-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3DLPGF8021281 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 21:25:16 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ( by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 17:25:15 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Thu, 13 Apr 2017 17:25:15 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-14.txt
Thread-Index: AQHStI/WY1L6K5PHoUOW76u40A8TdqHDz74A
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 21:25:15 +0000
Message-ID: <D51563BC.A893D%acee@cisco.com>
References: <149211329051.15702.16698615597957952556@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <149211329051.15702.16698615597957952556@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <7186C9E83F734747AF3A9F2EC55562C3@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/rkTMQ0kpN1ruhQkfPzJgNxzfzkI>
Subject: [OSPF] FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-14.txt
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 21:25:19 -0000

This version has clarifications with respect to TLV and Sub-TLV validation
and backward compatibility. Additionally, we have two new authors
associated with implementations.

Now that we have implementations, we’ll be able to progress this draft and
advance dependent drafts.


On 4/13/17, 3:54 PM, "OSPF on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org"
<ospf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote:

>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>This draft is a work item of the Open Shortest Path First IGP of the IETF.
>        Title           : OSPFv3 LSA Extendibility
>        Authors         : Acee Lindem
>                          Abhay Roy
>                          Dirk Goethals
>                          Veerendranatha Reddy Vallem
>                          Fred Baker
>	Filename        : draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-14.txt
>	Pages           : 37
>	Date            : 2017-04-13
>   OSPFv3 requires functional extension beyond what can readily be done
>   with the fixed-format Link State Advertisement (LSA) as described in
>   RFC 5340.  Without LSA extension, attributes associated with OSPFv3
>   links and advertised IPv6 prefixes must be advertised in separate
>   LSAs and correlated to the fixed-format LSAs.  This document extends
>   the LSA format by encoding the existing OSPFv3 LSA information in
>   Type-Length-Value (TLV) tuples and allowing advertisement of
>   additional information with additional TLVs.  Backward compatibility
>   mechanisms are also described.
>The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>There are also htmlized versions available at:
>A diff from the previous version is available at:
>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>OSPF mailing list