IETF Logo Mail Archive

[OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions (Correct Draft Authors E-mail)

Clarence Filsfils <cfilsfil@cisco.com> Mon, 06 June 2016 13:58 UTC

Return-Path: <cfilsfil@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF9112D5AA; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 06:58:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.948
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.948 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ASVad_9XSSO7; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 06:58:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A299112D0F4; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 06:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2098; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1465221534; x=1466431134; h=subject:references:to:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=e0CqPHy0RoYi/kJQ8EP1ECIQ3xa4lGwgvzkaE6NA//A=; b=mnr5QO/PdXvBom/MaKnuNifx/VP34HMc26puUWcpfhmT00SmeqkEUA/H FbVm3CYpbSyxY39AIjGip4xy+Vb7StnwpYULjjMevBsT9Lq8MkUJKlVdu AF00jAqEk7WnM2Wqgb3d59AbeSGMulF1S4z152eJsHYBrUK6dx7UcnGSS U=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DPAQAJgVVX/xbLJq1bhBB9ulmBehcNhW4CgWsUAQEBAQEBAWUnhEUBAQEDAQEBARoGDwEFNgoGCxwDAQIBAgIFFgQHAgIJAwIBAgEVKAgHDAYCAQGIIwgOqhKQfwEBAQEBBQEBAQEBARwFgQGFJowOglkBBJhIhgOII4FphFCDCYVaAo9aHjaCOYE3OjKKGQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,427,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="677573507"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 06 Jun 2016 13:58:52 +0000
Received: from [10.61.235.140] ([10.61.235.140]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u56Dwqoo019019; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 13:58:52 GMT
References: <AD7DC97A-7613-4937-BB38-C2BDC7808973@cisco.com>
To: draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org, ospf@ietf.org
From: Clarence Filsfils <cfilsfil@cisco.com>
X-Forwarded-Message-Id: <AD7DC97A-7613-4937-BB38-C2BDC7808973@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <5755819C.7030102@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 15:58:52 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AD7DC97A-7613-4937-BB38-C2BDC7808973@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/saNuItGeMxiCv8rDC7bAmAgsESo>
Subject: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions (Correct Draft Authors E-mail)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 13:58:57 -0000

I’m not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this draft.

Cheers,
Clarence




> From: Stefano Previdi <sprevidi@cisco.com>
> Subject: Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions (Correct Draft Authors E-mail)
> Date: June 6, 2016 at 2:45:23 PM GMT+2
> To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
> Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org>
>
> Hi,
>
> I’m not aware of any undisclosed IPR related to this draft.
>
> s.
>
>
>> On Jun 3, 2016, at 11:45 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>> Authors,
>>
>> For the final time, can you confirm whether or not you are aware of any
>> IPR other than?
>>
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2401/
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2233/ (the IPR statement on the non-WG
>> draft version)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>>
>> On 6/2/16, 10:04 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
>>
>>> The WG last call ended a couple weeks ago and I will act as document
>>> shepherd and request publication.
>>> Thanks,
>>> Acee
>>>
>>> On 5/4/16, 11:41 AM, "OSPF on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)"
>>> <ospf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of acee@cisco.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> The subject draft is very stable, has multiple interoperable
>>>> implementations, and many (including myself) have done thorough reviews.
>>>> I
>>>> believe we are ready for WG last call for this very important draft.
>>>>
>>>> With great pleasure, this begins the WG last call for the subject draft.
>>>> Please send your comments to this list prior to 12:00 AM GMT, May 19th,
>>>> 2016.
>>>>
>>>> Here is a URL for your convenance:
>>>>
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensio
>>>> n
>>>> s
>>>> /
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Acee
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> OSPF mailing list
>>>> OSPF@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>>>
>>
>

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status