IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] OSPF 2-Part Metric IPR Poll

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 25 April 2016 14:54 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9DE812D156; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 07:54:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.506
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.506 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MQOiYrv8Vn_s; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 07:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D96612D603; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 07:53:52 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=12573; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1461596032; x=1462805632; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=e4RqX2osPowXIF0FSsQM94XiMAroqZnDRTNtqP0iqfc=; b=Uo+2tGMZhBj0imJ+rSX+j73ekEID62vIGXBtXhN2xMrLDUFODF9WGi5p 4SXkN1nLjwc4ePut5WtsSSLK6+eW6TLao/SGIGTFzoALCe/qR5pZ7Lr5/ HkzoCm14b1Ja/QmP79RTqwW52YzsDrd1/iXpGWTVX3ZeMPHLASFHY2foh 4=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AUAgCrLh5X/5pdJa1bA4JsTFN9BrR9gmSCDwENgXWGDgIcgRU4FAEBAQEBAQFlJ4RBAQEBBCMKTA4CAgEIEQMBAQEoAwICAhQcFAkIAgQBDQWIKrB0kFIBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEVBIpohCkRCwcJCgELCgIPgjmCVgWTHoRxAY4UgWaETYhdjy4BHgEBQoNrbIcpPn8BAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="5.24,533,1454976000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="95363356"
Received: from rcdn-core-3.cisco.com ([173.37.93.154]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Apr 2016 14:53:51 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by rcdn-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u3PErppO015460 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:53:51 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:53:50 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:53:50 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "DuBois, Dave" <Dave.DuBois@gd-ms.com>, "Abhay Roy (akr)" <akr@cisco.com>, "draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: OSPF 2-Part Metric IPR Poll
Thread-Index: AQHRnvnVer3C/ZKj/UeSI7iLokPzUZ+axpSA
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:53:50 +0000
Message-ID: <D343A7A7.5C1D7%acee@cisco.com>
References: <D3412635.5C118%acee@cisco.com> <7f0e8ef5-c748-c870-e562-e897687f6ca6@cisco.com> <921B090B7CF74C4C81287D0B8526303D4528881D@AZRC4SAZMSG14.rc4s.com>
In-Reply-To: <921B090B7CF74C4C81287D0B8526303D4528881D@AZRC4SAZMSG14.rc4s.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D343A7A75C1D7aceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/schB5P3qN61SXjIOBh_eeDLWVR4>
Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] OSPF 2-Part Metric IPR Poll
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:54:03 -0000

Thanks Dave (OSPF WG List added),
Acee

From: "DuBois, Dave" <Dave.DuBois@gd-ms.com<mailto:Dave.DuBois@gd-ms.com>>
Date: Monday, April 25, 2016 at 9:53 AM
To: "Abhay Roy (akr)" <akr@cisco.com<mailto:akr@cisco.com>>, "draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric@ietf.org>>
Cc: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>, "DuBois, Dave" <Dave.DuBois@gd-ms.com<mailto:Dave.DuBois@gd-ms.com>>
Subject: RE: OSPF 2-Part Metric IPR Poll

I have no IPR to report.

Thanks
Dave Dubois
GDC4S
Office - 508-880-2249

This message and/or attachments may include information subject to GDC4S O.M. 1.8.6 and GD Corporate Policy 07-105 and are intended to be accessed only by authorized recipients.  Use, storage and transmission are governed by General Dynamics and its policies. Contractual restrictions apply to third parties.  Recipients should refer to the policies or contract to determine proper handling.  Unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited.  If you are not an intended recipient, please contact the sender and destroy all copies of the original message.

From: Abhay Roy [mailto:akr@cisco.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2016 1:43 PM
To: draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-two-part-metric@ietf.org>
Cc: Acee Lindem
Subject: OSPF 2-Part Metric IPR Poll

Authors,

Please confirm you have either no IPR, or your IPR disclosures are reported already.


Regards,

-Abhay



PS: Please note, we need *all* authors to explicitly ack before we can move this document further.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email