Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator

["Acee Lindem (acee)" <[e-mail]>]

Hi Carlos,
We are going to wait on the DISCUSS on the base document given that our decision that it was out-of-scope was predicated on the fact that this would be described in the document. This was the issue I originally raised and it got pushed to the BFD WG - right?
Thanks,
Acee

From: OSPF <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> on behalf of Acee Lindem <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Date: Friday, February 5, 2016 at 10:44 AM
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Cc: "[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, OSPF WG List <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator

Thanks Carlos - I will request publication by Monday. I want to capture the last discussion in the shepherding write-up.
Thanks,
Acee

From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Date: Friday, February 5, 2016 at 9:15 AM
To: Acee Lindem <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Cc: Manav Bhatia <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, "[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, OSPF WG List <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator

Thanks Acee. You were right. Text added now and rev++ posted.

Thanks,

— Carlos.

On Feb 5, 2016, at 8:00 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:

Carlos, Manav,
 I remember now as well - this is the text I was referring to after the discussion including Les.
Thanks,
Acee

From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Date: Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 10:33 PM
To: Manav Bhatia <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Cc: Acee Lindem <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, "[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, OSPF WG List <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator

Thank you Manav! I remember now :-)

Done :-)

https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator-03

Thanks,

— Carlos.

On Feb 4, 2016, at 9:53 PM, Manav Bhatia <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:

Hi Carlos,

I think we need to add the following in the current version:

“When multiple S-BFD discriminators are advertised how a given discriminator is mapped to a specific use case is out of scope for this document.”

I dont have the xml with me that i can update. Can you do it if you have one with you?

Cheers, Manav

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:
Hi, Acee,

On Feb 4, 2016, at 2:24 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:

Hi Carlos,

From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Date: Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 2:16 PM
To: Acee Lindem <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Cc: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, Manav Bhatia <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, "[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>" <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>, OSPF WG List <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator

Hi, Acee,

Following up on your note below regarding draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator, could you request publication and send this document to the IESG?

Has the document been updated with the proposed text? It hasn’t been modified since Sept 24, 2015.


Yes. The only text modification proposed and to be implemented was done here:
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator-02.txt

I do not believe there was anything else pending. Do you mean something else?

Thanks!

Carlos.

Thanks,
Acee


[BTW, its sibling document on ISIS is already in IESG ballot.]

Thanks!

— Carlos.

On Nov 11, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <[e-mail]<mailto:[e-mail]>> wrote:

I was more concerned about the consumer of the information than the IGPs. I did look at base S-BFD draft and I agree this unspecified. Let’s go forward than with the proposed text and I will request publication.

Thanks,
Acee