Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <> Fri, 05 February 2016 17:25 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4571A1ACDAA; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:25:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ykNRMiZcuOHG; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:25:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53DC41B2B23; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:25:31 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple;;; l=27331; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1454693131; x=1455902731; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=PeOFdylV6Ujru19Oh4bjdqzGa1gVtdW1oPYzGmdaeDE=; b=Djz43yApzzHFEnW+Vp7uLeo+0b866gj6M0gceM4IkCkjQv52PpGPNMgu dI1heqouJsIMvfPowTsfYkidZRGuwsMi82uEVzHbJG+Vz6FWND3yUCG21 8p5gUg6uzspqdCoLTVbgXBExlwMgauBKTICAUDufXMJCszXwZe/+nAuiv Q=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,401,1449532800"; d="scan'208,217";a="235351600"
Received: from ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 05 Feb 2016 17:25:30 +0000
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u15HPT43026100 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 17:25:30 GMT
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:25:29 -0500
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 12:25:29 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <>, "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 17:25:29 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D2DA44C74BBAAaceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
Cc: OSPF WG List <>, "" <>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 17:25:34 -0000

Hi Carlos,
We are going to wait on the DISCUSS on the base document given that our decision that it was out-of-scope was predicated on the fact that this would be described in the document. This was the issue I originally raised and it got pushed to the BFD WG - right?

From: OSPF <<>> on behalf of Acee Lindem <<>>
Date: Friday, February 5, 2016 at 10:44 AM
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <<>>
Cc: "<>" <<>>, OSPF WG List <<>>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator

Thanks Carlos - I will request publication by Monday. I want to capture the last discussion in the shepherding write-up.

From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <<>>
Date: Friday, February 5, 2016 at 9:15 AM
To: Acee Lindem <<>>
Cc: Manav Bhatia <<>>, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <<>>, "<>" <<>>, OSPF WG List <<>>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator

Thanks Acee. You were right. Text added now and rev++ posted.


— Carlos.

On Feb 5, 2016, at 8:00 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <<>> wrote:

Carlos, Manav,
 I remember now as well - this is the text I was referring to after the discussion including Les.

From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <<>>
Date: Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 10:33 PM
To: Manav Bhatia <<>>
Cc: Acee Lindem <<>>, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <<>>, "<>" <<>>, OSPF WG List <<>>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator

Thank you Manav! I remember now :-)

Done :-)


— Carlos.

On Feb 4, 2016, at 9:53 PM, Manav Bhatia <<>> wrote:

Hi Carlos,

I think we need to add the following in the current version:

“When multiple S-BFD discriminators are advertised how a given discriminator is mapped to a specific use case is out of scope for this document.”

I dont have the xml with me that i can update. Can you do it if you have one with you?

Cheers, Manav

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) <<>> wrote:
Hi, Acee,

On Feb 4, 2016, at 2:24 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <<>> wrote:

Hi Carlos,

From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <<>>
Date: Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 2:16 PM
To: Acee Lindem <<>>
Cc: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <<>>, Manav Bhatia <<>>, "<>" <<>>, OSPF WG List <<>>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator

Hi, Acee,

Following up on your note below regarding draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator, could you request publication and send this document to the IESG?

Has the document been updated with the proposed text? It hasn’t been modified since Sept 24, 2015.

Yes. The only text modification proposed and to be implemented was done here:

I do not believe there was anything else pending. Do you mean something else?




[BTW, its sibling document on ISIS is already in IESG ballot.]


— Carlos.

On Nov 11, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <<>> wrote:

I was more concerned about the consumer of the information than the IGPs. I did look at base S-BFD draft and I agree this unspecified. Let’s go forward than with the proposed text and I will request publication.