IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Fri, 05 February 2016 03:33 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC8771B3444; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 19:33:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wfghKMUaJ0Wm; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 19:33:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85F1E1A8F3B; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 19:33:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=13342; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1454643226; x=1455852826; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=7OZ2ZpOWinPG5X2FOx1FqK6OqGAw9RE0CcJjQg2MvKk=; b=RWcMHBhJ9CLVw8BybzciMGHaKP764XdROo20ebWQF1Vy10y8sqciunDA rIF4ILXLUFSkjHLr66cLZAW94eLDm2Q5zgjYCTFnmNd9X3abrd3gaq89t APLOhyVqFYdcEhQtC9mNRw6vfvy8t5XRIz9fi5Ywl60NT9QQ9FdZsR6WL 0=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 841
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DCAgAzF7RW/4wNJK1egm5MUm0GiFWueIITDoFmI4VqAoE6OBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEQQEBAQMBI1YFCwIBCBEDAQIBJwMCAiERFAkIAgQOBQ6HeAMKCA6xKIoaDYRHAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBDQQEhhKBbYJKgjeCGw2CUyuBDwWSbIQFAYJ9gWRqhhGBc4FbjRaFb4EPg2+DUQEeAUOCAxmBSGoBiH98AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,398,1449532800"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="235086996"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 05 Feb 2016 03:33:45 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (xch-rtp-015.cisco.com [64.101.220.155]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u153Xjqr002076 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 03:33:45 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 22:33:44 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 22:33:44 -0500
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: Manav Bhatia <manavbhatia@gmail.com>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator
Thread-Index: AQHRX4CVRGRf7e6ISkyrMJZ6tz0da58cmAUAgAAGoYCAAHcEAIAACy0A
Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 03:33:44 +0000
Message-ID: <D35900BF-2CD6-4FFB-B403-49C1210B7547@cisco.com>
References: <D252E730.385E8%acee@cisco.com> <CAG1kdojiU6fzn7XYSSdpfabxMDUQYvbgNNRCjZbraJKq2+WwJQ@mail.gmail.com> <D2668656.3CED2%acee@cisco.com> <c3caff28c3d243b99e523be8bc64719f@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <D2669DC6.3CF08%acee@cisco.com> <8ef4f51407804a91950ab126277368a6@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <D2691731.3D460%acee@cisco.com> <DBFC89CC-221C-42C8-8A11-E0E5A49170EC@cisco.com> <D2D90F1A.4B992%acee@cisco.com> <D055B8DB-8D78-4CEC-8E7F-90E9BD6E0A47@cisco.com> <CAG1kdohexHAJBRas53K7YB+U3yE_Nhy5FGd-n4vmr47dNMbU6A@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAG1kdohexHAJBRas53K7YB+U3yE_Nhy5FGd-n4vmr47dNMbU6A@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.82.214.67]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_61477233-D1AB-4DA3-B963-37FE11ECC53C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/u0zbr-GFcKhgxsQUSeAVFU9a3zw>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 03:33:48 -0000

Thank you Manav! I remember now :-)

Done :-)

https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator-03 <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator-03>

Thanks,

— Carlos.

> On Feb 4, 2016, at 9:53 PM, Manav Bhatia <manavbhatia@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi Carlos,
> 
> I think we need to add the following in the current version:
> 
> “When multiple S-BFD discriminators are advertised how a given discriminator is mapped to a specific use case is out of scope for this document.”
> 
> I dont have the xml with me that i can update. Can you do it if you have one with you?
> 
> Cheers, Manav
> 
> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) <cpignata@cisco.com <mailto:cpignata@cisco.com>> wrote:
> Hi, Acee,
> 
>> On Feb 4, 2016, at 2:24 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com <mailto:acee@cisco.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Carlos,
>> 
>> From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com <mailto:cpignata@cisco.com>>
>> Date: Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 2:16 PM
>> To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com <mailto:acee@cisco.com>>
>> Cc: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com <mailto:ginsberg@cisco.com>>, Manav Bhatia <manavbhatia@gmail.com <mailto:manavbhatia@gmail.com>>, "draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org>>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>>
>> Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator
>> 
>> Hi, Acee,
>> 
>> Following up on your note below regarding draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator, could you request publication and send this document to the IESG?
>> 
>> Has the document been updated with the proposed text? It hasn’t been modified since Sept 24, 2015.
>> 
> 
> Yes. The only text modification proposed and to be implemented was done here:
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator-02.txt <https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator-02.txt>
> 
> I do not believe there was anything else pending. Do you mean something else?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Carlos.
> 
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>> 
>> 
>> [BTW, its sibling document on ISIS is already in IESG ballot.]
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> — Carlos.
>> 
>>> On Nov 11, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com <mailto:acee@cisco.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I was more concerned about the consumer of the information than the IGPs. I did look at base S-BFD draft and I agree this unspecified. Let’s go forward than with the proposed text and I will request publication.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Acee
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email