Re: [OSPF] New Version Notification for draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt

"Osborne, Eric" <eric.osborne@level3.com> Wed, 08 October 2014 15:45 UTC

Return-Path: <eric.osborne@level3.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BFC1A6F82 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 08:45:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bFAD6bV9_sF1 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 08:45:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail1.bemta8.messagelabs.com (mail1.bemta8.messagelabs.com [216.82.243.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E195A1A6FB3 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 08:45:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [216.82.242.147:26037] by server-11.bemta-8.messagelabs.com id 11/46-25814-81C55345; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:45:28 +0000
X-Env-Sender: eric.osborne@level3.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-15.tower-95.messagelabs.com!1412783127!38553643!1
X-Originating-IP: [209.245.18.38]
X-StarScan-Received:
X-StarScan-Version: 6.12.2; banners=-,-,-
X-VirusChecked: Checked
Received: (qmail 30932 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2014 15:45:27 -0000
Received: from unknown.level3.net (HELO messagelabs2.level3.com) (209.245.18.38) by server-15.tower-95.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 8 Oct 2014 15:45:27 -0000
Received: from USIDCWVEHT02.corp.global.level3.com (usidcwveht02.corp.global.level3.com [10.1.142.32]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "USIDCWVEHT02.corp.global.level3.com", Issuer "VIDCCERT0001" (not verified)) by messagelabs2.level3.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B80B2BA7F; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:45:27 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from USADCWVEHT02.corp.global.level3.com (10.2.36.142) by USIDCWVEHT02.corp.global.level3.com (10.1.142.32) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.195.1; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 09:45:26 -0600
Received: from USIDCWVEMBX08.corp.global.level3.com ([fe80::20f7:9e5b:2efa:2ad8]) by usadcwveht02.corp.global.level3.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Wed, 8 Oct 2014 11:45:26 -0400
From: "Osborne, Eric" <eric.osborne@level3.com>
To: Youjianjie <youjianjie@huawei.com>, "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: New Version Notification for draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt
Thread-Index: AQHP2sRacNlB1LfkPUCKV4l1MfxdD5wX3ddwgA2jYQCAAOUi0A==
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:45:24 +0000
Message-ID: <63CB93BC589C1B4BAFDB41A0A19B7ACDF930C2@USIDCWVEMBX08.corp.global.level3.com>
References: <F6C28B32DA084644BB6C8D0BD65B669D11A0A9@nkgeml509-mbs.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <F6C28B32DA084644BB6C8D0BD65B669D11A0A9@nkgeml509-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.1.196.205]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/vDHz1Lran2BfdSmlePX6Rzj9xNc
Subject: Re: [OSPF] New Version Notification for draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 15:45:33 -0000

I'm not sure this has much value.  The vast majority of dynamic PE-CE is done with BGP; the little bit that isn't BGP is, in my experience, RIP.  I don't think I've seen many (any?) OSPF PE-CE deployments.  




eric

-----Original Message-----
From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Youjianjie
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 10:11 PM
To: ospf@ietf.org
Subject: [OSPF] 转发: New Version Notification for draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt

Hi all,

This document discusses the use cases that OSPF is used to distribute FlowSpec routes. This document also defines a new OSPF FlowSpec Opaque Link State Advertisement (LSA) encoding format.
Your comments are appreciated.

Best Regards,
Jianjie

-----邮件原件-----
发件人: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org] 
发送时间: 2014年9月28日 10:32
收件人: Youjianjie; Youjianjie; liuweihang; liuweihang
主题: New Version Notification for draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt


A new version of I-D, draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt
has been successfully submitted by Jianjie You and posted to the IETF repository.

Name:		draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions
Revision:	01
Title:		OSPF Extensions for Flow Specification
Document date:	2014-09-27
Group:		Individual Submission
Pages:		11
URL:            http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01.txt
Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions/
Htmlized:       http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01
Diff:           http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-liang-ospf-flowspec-extensions-01

Abstract:
   This document discusses the use cases why OSPF (Open Shortest Path
   First) distributing flow specification (FlowSpec) routes is
   necessary.  This document also defines a new OSPF FlowSpec Opaque
   Link State Advertisement (LSA) encoding format that can be used to
   distribute FlowSpec routes.

   For the network only deploying IGP (Interior Gateway Protocol) (e.g.
   OSPF), it is expected to extend IGP to distribute FlowSpec routes.
   One advantage is to mitigate the impacts of Denial-of-Service (DoS)
   attacks.


                                                                                  


Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

The IETF Secretariat

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf