Re: [OSPF] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig-12: (with COMMENT)
Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org> Mon, 26 January 2015 14:01 UTC
Return-Path: <barryleiba@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54FF1A88C0; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 06:01:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a3fVsb8_PWf4; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 06:01:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-la0-x22c.google.com (mail-la0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A30181A88B7; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 06:01:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id s18so7790699lam.3; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 06:01:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9VzASVHET5Thm4mpTcYIned+FBp3d3YqMZqJRsSvEiw=; b=sy6kE2PI8cdwWnb0FDqihQ3PScAvIlLSQTdq3Z17Vm7eB+4ScG2gkHidlnsckqFfae aZCUftAyxmp0THcxY3TLgtDsxD7ztzuuCc8aNoc5OQNTb1tdGMKivSwrbCOCufsP8yjV fS2qJ/WUACD2o9o3tHiCTCGfy9WRzhLxcZr+h3gFg01N7pbfySd9hT82fJHPjXHp4X4u zjNFzMhBypyGBgIgjczb+IfIX0jC/FBdBPEAcJ0gDuecGglm7DxosUiaatyecp8Wy2m0 54TnlcaM8BcqlDXtZMvkHMaTEnxuBhblWIt7XdhJqE8mu6xoxfEakywH584ewO7rKNW4 RC+w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.152.27.130 with SMTP id t2mr20832140lag.28.1422280870146; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 06:01:10 -0800 (PST)
Sender: barryleiba@gmail.com
Received: by 10.152.127.168 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Jan 2015 06:01:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D0EBAFED.C41D%acee@cisco.com>
References: <20150126113942.22176.94.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <D0EBAFED.C41D%acee@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:01:10 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth: kC0OhgiyfIbyUzLRiFPgWCnCDmk
Message-ID: <CALaySJ+f9sQ5LbhFeWhpsx=40LFMrgmNYHd6bya5Ki_2cr9zZA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Barry Leiba <barryleiba@computer.org>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/vU0Pyx72ROZ9ZXV9xhyggjN5tkU>
Cc: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>, "ospf-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <ospf-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, Ing-Wher Chen <ing-wher.chen@ericsson.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig.all@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig.all@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig-12: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 14:01:13 -0000
>>The current term is "IETF Review" (not "IETF Consensus"), and you should >>have a normative reference to RFC 5226 here. > > I will add this. Thanks. >> It would also be good to >>say when IESG Approval is an appropriate alternative to IETF Review. > > I always interpreted this as either IETF Review or IESG Approval. Indeed. But we'd like to avoid having people make requests to the IESG when they should have done it with I-Ds and IETF Review. So it'd be nice (non-blocking nice) to have something that explains (very, very briefly) when going directly to the IESG is appropriate. b
- [OSPF] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ietf-o… Barry Leiba
- Re: [OSPF] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ie… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ie… Barry Leiba
- Re: [OSPF] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ie… Jari Arkko
- Re: [OSPF] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ie… Barry Leiba
- Re: [OSPF] Barry Leiba's No Objection on draft-ie… Jari Arkko