Re: MANET Extensions to OSPF

Russ White <ruwhite@CISCO.COM> Mon, 24 May 2004 18:54 UTC

References: <020f01c42c65$c8d8ffc0$0202a8c0@aceeinspiron>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <Pine.OSX.4.58.0405241452350.1499@eth-0-3-93-c4-40-3a.dhcp.nanog31.merit.net>
Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 14:54:30 -0400
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Russ White <ruwhite@CISCO.COM>
Subject: Re: MANET Extensions to OSPF
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: <020f01c42c65$c8d8ffc0$0202a8c0@aceeinspiron>
Precedence: list

>    6. Where both IPR and non-IPR encumbered mechanisms are proposed,
>       the WG will analyze the technical merits and will try to prefer
>       unencumbered technology without making technical sacrificies.

I would guess that most of the technical solutions available are going to
be IPR'd by the parties involved. As long as the terms of the IPR's
involved are "liberal," and acceptable by all the members of the WG, then
we should consider the best technical solution first.

:-)

Russ

__________________________________
riw@cisco.com CCIE <>< Grace Alone

Re: MANET Extensions to OSPF Russ White
Re: MANET Extensions to OSPF Acee Lindem