[OSPF] Attached hosts question
Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se> Wed, 11 March 2009 17:39 UTC
Return-Path: <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
X-Original-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 480693A69F1 for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:39:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BQy26Q2qtJuG for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:38:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gw1.transmode.se (gw1.transmode.se [213.115.205.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640CA3A6925 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:38:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sesr04.transmode.se (sesr04.transmode.se [192.168.201.15]) by gw1.transmode.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B114F159 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:39:32 +0100 (CET)
To: ospf@ietf.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-KeepSent: 7D9A4B41:2364B9EA-C1257576:006000F6; type=4; name=$KeepSent
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 8.5 December 05, 2008
Message-ID: <OF7D9A4B41.2364B9EA-ONC1257576.006000F6-C1257576.006100D1@transmode.se>
From: Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:39:32 +0100
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on sesr04/Transmode(Release 8.5|December 05, 2008) at 2009-03-11 18:39:32, Serialize complete at 2009-03-11 18:39:32
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Subject: [OSPF] Attached hosts question
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:39:00 -0000
Last in "12.4.1. Router-LSAs" one can read: After consideration of all the router interfaces, host links are added to the router-LSA by examining the list of attached hosts belonging to Area A. A host route is represented as a Type 3 link (stub network) whose Link ID is the host's IP address, Link Data is the mask of all ones (0xffffffff), and cost the host's configured cost (see Section C.7). C.7 Host route parameters Host routes are advertised in router-LSAs as stub networks with mask 0xffffffff. They indicate either router interfaces to point-to-point networks, looped router interfaces, or IP hosts that are directly connected to the router (e.g., via a SLIP line). For each host directly connected to the router, the following items must be configured: Host IP address The IP address of the host. Cost of link to host The cost of sending a packet to the host, in terms of the link state metric. However, since the host probably has only a single connection to the internet, the actual configured cost in many cases is unimportant (i.e., will have no effect on routing). Area ID The OSPF area to which the host belongs. I read this as one can manually configure a list of attached hosts in the router and these are then announced in the router LSA. What I don't get is if one should do any validation that the configured hosts are reachable or not? The spec doesn't mention this and I am getting the feeling that this should just be a stupid list of hosts that gets announced regardless if they are reachable or not. Jocke
- [OSPF] Attached hosts question Joakim Tjernlund
- Re: [OSPF] Attached hosts question Acee Lindem
- Re: [OSPF] Attached hosts question Joakim Tjernlund
- Re: [OSPF] Attached hosts question Acee Lindem