Re: Address Family Support in OSPFv3

Sina Mirtorabi <sina@CISCO.COM> Thu, 10 July 2003 23:40 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA26921 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:40:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <2.00A60E15@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:40:22 -0400
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 48091946 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:39:51 -0400
Received: from 171.68.227.75 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 19:39:51 -0400
Received: from smirtoraw2k03 (sjc-vpn1-5.cisco.com [10.21.96.5]) by fire.cisco.com (8.11.7+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id h6ANdoT00213 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 16:39:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300
Message-ID: <001001c3473c$8ec3c3b0$386545ab@amer.cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 16:39:51 -0700
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Sina Mirtorabi <sina@CISCO.COM>
Subject: Re: Address Family Support in OSPFv3
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: <3F0DB69A.2060706@redback.com>
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Acee,

->I haven't thought about it in great depth. I guess if you
->use solely address family foo prefixes for a address family
->foo instance it might be possible.

Yes as I said previously, since a prefix carry prefix length no new LSA
is required to define prefix information for other AF and this is true
for either approach

Sina