Re: [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-03

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com> Tue, 22 September 2015 08:12 UTC

Return-Path: <ppsenak@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 528F61A0270; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:12:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vs7fyNPTk6CR; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:12:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-3.cisco.com (aer-iport-3.cisco.com [173.38.203.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ACD471A0248; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 01:12:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=594; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1442909547; x=1444119147; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OCFCI7OdH35xUySYUbU++ggUiM0AhrDgdpG/DXk59sU=; b=JTJDmB6fMg+0UOWY9px05dqcrWcilhfHrroMHDpUZB7XDZuolQ4ixCDi YYsgHxVGFFdFYWQJWYgBqj/salWGc3kY49FQXMGF3mjKiT7x0ByVGD4gA asoMZpbd5wUYFNK3UCLHIjUKJrs/MVP2GYf46jisPwW8iPb228hEx9cab U=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,572,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="605274415"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-1.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 22 Sep 2015 08:12:25 +0000
Received: from [10.60.140.62] (ams-ppsenak-nitro13.cisco.com [10.60.140.62]) by aer-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t8M8COLf009044; Tue, 22 Sep 2015 08:12:24 GMT
Message-ID: <56010D68.4040807@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 10:12:24 +0200
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL)" <anil.sn@huawei.com>, "sprevidi@cisco.com" <sprevidi@cisco.com>, "cfilsfil@cisco.com" <cfilsfil@cisco.com>, "hannes@juniper.net" <hannes@juniper.net>, "rob.shakir@bt.com" <rob.shakir@bt.com>, "draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions.all@ietf.org>
References: <327562D94EA7BF428CD805F338C31EF06C05F21E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <327562D94EA7BF428CD805F338C31EF06C05F21E@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/y2pacn-szNgueCkymbZ2LqhmPbc>
Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-segment-routing-extensions-03
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 08:12:28 -0000

Anil,

there is no support for multi topology in existing OSPFv3 specification. 
We can not define it in the SR draft.

thanks,
Peter

On 9/22/15 10:02 , Anil Kumar S N (VRP Network BL) wrote:
> Hi Authors,
>
> In OSPFv3 Extensions for Segment Routing I couldn’t find any references
> to MT-ID considered for Node, Prefix & Adjacency SID advertisement in
> contrast to OSPFv2 and ISIS SR extensions.
>
> Please let me know you opinion on the same.
>
> Thanks & Regards
>
> Anil S N
>
> “Be liberal in what you accept, and conservative in what you send” - Jon
> Postel
>