virtual link transit summary lsa

Kishore Kumar Y <kishoreky@FUTURE.FUTSOFT.COM> Fri, 09 January 2004 15:42 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id KAA07067 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Fri, 9 Jan 2004 10:42:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <15.00C99784@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 3:00:26 -0500
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 67153290 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 03:00:23 -0500
Received: from 209.119.0.100 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 02:50:23 -0500
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <9.00C99627@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 2:50:23 -0500
Received: from 203.197.140.35 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 02:50:22 -0500
Received: from kailash.future.futsoft.com (unverified [203.197.140.36]) by fsnt.future.futsoft.com (Content Technologies SMTPRS 4.3.6) with ESMTP id <T670212363dcbc58c2377c@fsnt.future.futsoft.com> for <OSPF@discuss.microsoft.com>; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 13:26:19 +0530
Received: from kishoreky (kishoreky.future.futsoft.com [10.6.4.95]) by kailash.future.futsoft.com (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id i087iXU17142 for <OSPF@discuss.microsoft.com>; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 13:14:34 +0530
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Importance: Normal
Message-ID: <001301c3d5bb$81e86e80$5f04060a@future.futsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 13:16:20 +0530
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Kishore Kumar Y <kishoreky@FUTURE.FUTSOFT.COM>
Subject: virtual link transit summary lsa
Comments: To: Mailing List <OSPF@discuss.microsoft.com>
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: <20020815.162132.64931757.yasu@sfc.wide.ad.jp>
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

          backbone                   transit area 1           area 2
  -----------R1-----------------R2----------------------R3-------
   10.0.0.1        20.0.0.x              30.0.0.x               40.0.0.1


i configured a virtual link between router R2 and R3.
the cost for each interface is 10.

my doubt is at router R3 10.0.0.0 network route entry path type
should be INTER AREA or INTRA AREA.

according to RFC 2328 section 16.3
while doing Transit summary lsa calculation path type should remain
same INTRA AREA or INTER AREA found during calculation 16.1 and 16.2

i feel path type should be INTRA AREA though the path is through transit
area.


********************************************
Yarlagadda Kishore Kumar
Future Software Ltd.,
480-481, Mount Road,
Nandanam, chennai 600 035
ph: 91-44-433 0550  Ex -305 (O)
kishoreky@future.futsoft.com
yarlagadda_kk@lycos.com
********************************************





***************************************************************************
This message is proprietary to Future Software Limited (FSL)
and is intended solely for the use of the individual to whom it
is addressed. It may contain  privileged or confidential information
and should not be circulated or used for any purpose other than for
what it is intended.

If you have received this message in error, please notify the
originator immediately. If you are not the intended recipient,
you are notified that you are strictly prohibited from using,
copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message.
FSL accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from
the use of the information transmitted by this email including
damage from virus.
***************************************************************************