[OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "Using Operator-defined TLVs for Agile Service Deployment"

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 17 March 2016 02:08 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41BE312DAF1 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 19:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VQRzcxw3vySF for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 19:08:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.86.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B824812DB00 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 19:08:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=580; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1458180514; x=1459390114; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=QxGAoOSjFalUUMTH9wkc/PRSHkFFvIIGiosg5hS8ZsM=; b=TkdlUdfrKbwtEOaQEZqAS6SpmCaFBignSyIB2zvwka4yy8/45T7bCQDC 7h4Xjx4Sh/eTV3PN8N9d/JVSeLmeG0a+iD9HhuhpyTl+t6d8tpz7TQbvv Xc5odU0HmbexMhAp/hKdeGBWVDHDuehALBohtxD7V6Qx/GGnJiJbwYcLc 8=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0BGBQASEepW/5hdJa1eg0aBR7oZgW+GK?= =?us-ascii?q?4EaORMBAQEBAQEBZCeESCMRVwEiAiYCBDAVEgSIOqE3j12PQgEBCAIBHXyRIoE?= =?us-ascii?q?6BZdRAY4AgU8BFYRJiFeOfgEhAUCDZYpPfgEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,347,1454976000"; d="scan'208";a="83624056"
Received: from rcdn-core-1.cisco.com ([173.37.93.152]) by rcdn-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Mar 2016 02:08:34 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (xch-rtp-015.cisco.com [64.101.220.155]) by rcdn-core-1.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u2H28Xjj019684 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 02:08:33 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 22:08:33 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 22:08:33 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: WG Adoption Poll for "Using Operator-defined TLVs for Agile Service Deployment"
Thread-Index: AQHRf/Ho6WRxQA5zQE2bUJRokiTbPw==
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 02:08:33 +0000
Message-ID: <D30F89DE.51A65%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <AF6E29E705FE3945AA0677D54FB7CA5B@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/yF_pFtnEbpvtCqdPi677LTAMe60>
Subject: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "Using Operator-defined TLVs for Agile Service Deployment"
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 02:08:38 -0000

We’ve discussed this draft a number of times. In my opinion, it seems like
a useful mechanism if one envisions a generalized API between OSPF and
user and third-party applications to convey application-specific
information learned from other OSPF routers. In many respects, this has
already been envisioned for OSPF Node Tags. Please indicate your opinion
on this draft before March 31st, 2016.

Thanks,
Acee