Re: [OSPF] Implementation Survey for OSPFv3 Extended LSAs

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 28 July 2017 19:28 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF311320A9 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 12:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -13.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-13.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MISSING_HEADERS=1.021, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lKMgdFSSZPyw for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 12:27:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2B4B13204C for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 12:27:54 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=6727; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1501270074; x=1502479674; h=from:cc:subject:date:message-id:references:in-reply-to: mime-version; bh=RYqXWzxkolj7MF4fkSlhC8TqeLMrmAQrssARN4Tzzsg=; b=VVQO1/DSXcMWthQ3gx+3fQw1P4D0CWZUqchjf1Kqf5mGQFOCLfPQ19/g UXyzw2ih+voXrKMhAxGOaXTolz42uwqnY1Ki3VKLIpWM+XGyUK0P+Xca/ lMlYWa4OxZ09jGxZPVTg5iPh2wvKDvmv2YBH297VOpV0sGCLAf381ipm+ w=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A8AQBwj3tZ/4QNJK1cGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgm9rgWkPB44Gj3mBNgQxkFyFL4IShUcCGgyDTT8YAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFEAgBAQEBAxgLVhACAQgRAwECKAMCAgIwFAkIAhIFhXKDWWSwNoImiz4BAQEBAQEEAQEBAQEBASGDKIhVhROCcxOCTgWfbQKUJIIMhVKKXpVxAR84gQp3FUl2D4YUdohygQ4BAQU
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.40,427,1496102400"; d="scan'208,217";a="273737729"
Received: from alln-core-10.cisco.com ([173.36.13.132]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 28 Jul 2017 19:27:53 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by alln-core-10.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v6SJRrH2025836 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 19:27:53 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 15:27:52 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Fri, 28 Jul 2017 15:27:52 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
CC: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Implementation Survey for OSPFv3 Extended LSAs
Thread-Index: AQHTB9ebn/cieETcEkm9xO67sAjq4Q==
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 19:27:52 +0000
Message-ID: <D5A106E7.BA8B7%acee@cisco.com>
References: <D5A106C6.BA8B2%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D5A106C6.BA8B2%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D5A106E7BA8B7aceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/yQHoUfyoZr1R2edfZF8r1_7m4bI>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Implementation Survey for OSPFv3 Extended LSAs
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 19:28:01 -0000

If anyone else has an implementation, please respond to the survey as well. I know there have been implementation specific queries.

Thanks,
Acee

From: OSPF <ospf-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>
Date: Friday, July 28, 2017 at 3:20 PM
To: "Goethals, Dirk (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" <dirk.goethals@nokia.com<mailto:dirk.goethals@nokia.com>>, Veerendranatha Reddy Vallem <veerendranatharv@huawei.com<mailto:veerendranatharv@huawei.com>>
Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org<mailto:ospf@ietf.org>>
Subject: [OSPF] Implementation Survey for OSPFv3 Extended LSAs

Hi Dirk, Veeru,

Please respond to the implementation survey questions below.

  1. Does your implementation support for all 9 OSPFv3 Extended LSAs?

  2. Does your implementation support for N-Bit Prefix Option?

  3. Does your implementation support OSPFv3 Extended LSAs across the entire routing domain?

  4. Does your implementation support per-area deployment of OSPF Extended LSAs (AS-External LSAs are legacy)?

  5. Does your implementation support full deployment of OSPFv3 Extended LSAs?

  6. Does your implementation support sparse mode deployment of OSPFv3 Extended LSAs?

  7. Does your implementation support any applications that make use of OSPFv3 Extended LSAs (e.g., Segment Routing)?

  8. Have you done any interoperability testing with other implementations?


Thanks,
Acee