Re: [p2pi] [tana] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter

I agree 100%, about both - charter and LETBET (which is my
favorite name proposal)

Cheers,
Michael


On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 10:10 +0300, Salvatore Loreto wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I also think the charter is very well scoped.
> 
> However I'd like to see the *multiple connections* work item elaborated 
> and explained a little bit more!
> 
> about the name proposal both "LETBET (LEss Than Best Effort Transport)" and
> "Scavenger Network Congestion Protocols" sound good proposal to me.
> 
> /sal
> 
> Michael Menth wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I also find the charter good and like Ingemar's name proposal "LETBET 
> > (LEss Than Best Effort Transport)"
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > Ingemar Johansson S wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Even though I understand that it is better to focus on the charter than
> >> in the name I too beleieve that TANA does not say much.
> >>
> >> I believe that somewhere along the track and also in the charter the
> >> term "less than best effort transmission" was/is mentioned
> >> A possible name would then be
> >> LETBET (LEss Than Best Effort Transport)
> >>
> >> That said... there are a whole bunch of WG names out there that at first
> >> glance does not say anything about the group.
> >> The charter looks OK from my perspective.
> >>
> >> /Ingemar
> >>
> >>  
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: tsv-area-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tsv-area-bounces@ietf.org] 
> >>> On Behalf Of Ted Faber
> >>> Sent: den 21 oktober 2008 18:51
> >>> To: Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[VZ]
> >>> Cc: TSV Area; tana@ietf.org; p2pi@ietf.org
> >>> Subject: Re: [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 09:12:10AM -0500, Eddy, Wesley M. 
> >>> (GRC-RCN0)[VZ] wrote:
> >>>    
> >>>> But if nobody else has a problem with the TANA name, I'll keep my 
> >>>> mouth shut so we don't waste time and energy.  There are       
> >>> bigger fish to fry!
> >>>
> >>> It should change.
> >>>
> >>> I care about congestion control and nothing in the expansion of TANA 
> >>> indicated it was about congestion (to me).
> >>>
> >>> -- 
> >>> Ted Faber
> >>> http://www.isi.edu/~faber           PGP: 
> >>> http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
> >>> Unexpected attachment on this mail? See 
> >>> http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
> >>>
> >>>     
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> tana mailing list
> >> tana@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tana
> >>   
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tana mailing list
> tana@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tana
> 

_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi