Re: [p2pi] [tana] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter

[Reinaldo Penno <[e-mail]>]

I'm not sure I'm reading the semantics of "Less than Best Effort" like other
folks. 

'Best Effort' has a well-defined semantics in the scope of Diffserv,
including a code point of its own. Less than best effort seems we are
defining a code point for such applications. Are we? The charter talks about
'end-to-end Diffserv'.

End-to-end diffserv is a challenge on its own given ISP policies, etc.

If the link is not saturated, are such application also treated as 'less
than best effort' by still being DSCP marked and treated differently within
routers? 

I would like if possible to decouple the 'less than best effort', as in
diffserv, from the algorithm per se.

Besides, there are ISPs that are worried about the effect that P2P have on
other applications when the link is saturated, but otherwise they do not
care. P2P would be treated like best effort in non-saturated situations (a
more ECN type approach).

Thanks,

Reinaldo


On 10/22/08 12:53 AM, "Michael Welzl" <[e-mail]> wrote:

> I agree 100%, about both - charter and LETBET (which is my
> favorite name proposal)
> 
> Cheers,
> Michael
> 
> 
> On Wed, 2008-10-22 at 10:10 +0300, Salvatore Loreto wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I also think the charter is very well scoped.
>> 
>> However I'd like to see the *multiple connections* work item elaborated
>> and explained a little bit more!
>> 
>> about the name proposal both "LETBET (LEss Than Best Effort Transport)" and
>> "Scavenger Network Congestion Protocols" sound good proposal to me.
>> 
>> /sal
>> 
>> Michael Menth wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> I also find the charter good and like Ingemar's name proposal "LETBET
>>> (LEss Than Best Effort Transport)"
>>> 
>>> Michael
>>> 
>>> Ingemar Johansson S wrote:
>>>> Hi
>>>> 
>>>> Even though I understand that it is better to focus on the charter than
>>>> in the name I too beleieve that TANA does not say much.
>>>> 
>>>> I believe that somewhere along the track and also in the charter the
>>>> term "less than best effort transmission" was/is mentioned
>>>> A possible name would then be
>>>> LETBET (LEss Than Best Effort Transport)
>>>> 
>>>> That said... there are a whole bunch of WG names out there that at first
>>>> glance does not say anything about the group.
>>>> The charter looks OK from my perspective.
>>>> 
>>>> /Ingemar
>>>> 
>>>>  
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]]
>>>>> On Behalf Of Ted Faber
>>>>> Sent: den 21 oktober 2008 18:51
>>>>> To: Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[VZ]
>>>>> Cc: TSV Area; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
>>>>> Subject: Re: [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 09:12:10AM -0500, Eddy, Wesley M.
>>>>> (GRC-RCN0)[VZ] wrote:
>>>>>    
>>>>>> But if nobody else has a problem with the TANA name, I'll keep my
>>>>>> mouth shut so we don't waste time and energy.  There are
>>>>> bigger fish to fry!
>>>>> 
>>>>> It should change.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I care about congestion control and nothing in the expansion of TANA
>>>>> indicated it was about congestion (to me).
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Ted Faber
>>>>> http://www.isi.edu/~faber           PGP:
>>>>> http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
>>>>> Unexpected attachment on this mail? See
>>>>> http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
>>>>> 
>>>>>     
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> tana mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tana
>>>>   
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> tana mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tana
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tana mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tana

_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi