Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement

Laird Popkin wrote:
> LP: Thanks, this is very helpful. I wasn't clear on the distinction
> between ALTO and TANA BOF's - the descriptions in the email archives
> seem to overlap somewhat. Is there a list of which items from the
> P2Pi Workshop are ALTO and which are TANA?

Laird: I believe that figuring out what things go on the ALTO list
and what things go on the TANA list will be one of the
things to be done at the BoFs in Dublin.  So far, we have the
high level characterization that Lars had posted to the p2pi
mailing list shortly after the MIT workshop (please see
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/p2pi/current/msg00068.html)
 From that email, (3) is deemed to be within the purview of
ALTO and (1) TANA.  (2) could conceivably be split up as
a set of guideline documents, some applicable to TANA and
others to ALTO.

> Is there a TANA BOF meeting scheduled? If both TANA and ALTO are on
> the agenda in Dublin, that'd be convenient. :-)

Both the BoFs have been approved by their respective ADs, and are
now with the agenda director, waiting to match time slots that
minimize overlaps with other WGs and AD availability.

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
2701 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9F-546, Lisle, Illinois 60532 (USA)
Email: vkg@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
WWW:   http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bell-labs
_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi