Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [Was: Re: discussing P2PI-related standardization in Dublin]

"Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com> Fri, 13 June 2008 15:33 UTC

Return-Path: <p2pi-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: p2pi-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-p2pi-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE42D3A68F2; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:33:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40EEF3A68F2 for <p2pi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:33:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.45
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.45 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.149, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jmTNkONvXtSw for <p2pi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ihemail3.lucent.com (ihemail3.lucent.com [135.245.0.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5092A3A67A4 for <p2pi@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:33:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from umail.lucent.com (h135-3-40-61.lucent.com [135.3.40.61]) by ihemail3.lucent.com (8.13.8/IER-o) with ESMTP id m5DFXqM4028747 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:33:52 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [135.185.244.90] (il0015vkg1.ih.lucent.com [135.185.244.90]) by umail.lucent.com (8.13.8/TPES) with ESMTP id m5DFXnOI007200; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:33:49 -0500 (CDT)
Message-ID: <48529360.3080301@alcatel-lucent.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 10:33:52 -0500
From: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com>
Organization: Bell Labs Security Technology Research Group
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
References: <565621476.393261213359293462.JavaMail.root@dkny.pando.com> <4852862D.9030202@telecomitalia.it> <20080613151246.GA20314@nic.fr> <485290D5.1010909@alcatel-lucent.com> <20080613152734.GA25170@nic.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20080613152734.GA25170@nic.fr>
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.57 on 135.245.2.37
Cc: p2pi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [Was: Re: discussing P2PI-related standardization in Dublin]
X-BeenThere: p2pi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: P2P Infrastructure Discussion <p2pi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/p2pi>
List-Post: <mailto:p2pi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org

Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:23:01AM -0500,
>  Vijay K. Gurbani <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote 
>  a message of 34 lines which said:
> 
>> I am sorry but could you please expand on "ICS"?
> 
> Sorry, Internet Coordinates Systems as in
> <http://www.imconf.net/imc-2003/papers/p310-lim11.pdf> or similar
> works.

Ah, OK.  I figured as much, but before suggesting anything, I
wanted to be sure.

A discussion of ICS as epitomized by Vivaldi, PIC, et al. is
discussed in our paper (in the URL I sent you for the iDisk
volume, see the paper "29 alto.pdf").

Thanks,

- vijay
-- 
Vijay K. Gurbani, Bell Laboratories, Alcatel-Lucent
2701 Lucent Lane, Rm. 9F-546, Lisle, Illinois 60532 (USA)
Email: vkg@{alcatel-lucent.com,bell-labs.com,acm.org}
WWW:   http://www.alcatel-lucent.com/bell-labs
_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi