Re: [p2pi] [tana] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter

["Narayanan, Vidya" <[e-mail]>]

I do like BACKOFF as well.  I think "File" captures what we are doing here quite well - it doesn't look like we are dealing with all kinds of large data - as I said in one of my earlier emails, video fits the large data bill, but, it doesn't look like we would consider that as part of this work.  

In fact, it would benefit to have the charter explicitly call out that this is meant for large data that can be modeled as file downloads or something to that effect. 

Vidya 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On 
> Behalf Of [e-mail]
> Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2008 6:53 AM
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [tana] [p2pi] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter
> 
> Yes, that seems a much better name. Also really memorable 
> which helps. I think it can be traced back to Marshall 
> Eubanks. As you say flow sounds a bit limiting and so does 
> file. On the other hand it bears its meaning on its face so 
> quibbles about what the FF stands for are probably just 
> distractions...
> 
> Toby 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bryan Ford [mailto:[e-mail]]
> > Sent: 23 October 2008 13:55
> > To: Moncaster,T,Toby,CXR9 R
> > Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; 
> > [e-mail]; [e-mail]; [e-mail];
> [e-mail]
> > Subject: Re: [tana] [p2pi] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter
> > 
> > On Oct 23, 2008, at 12:41 PM, <[e-mail]> 
> > <[e-mail]  > wrote:
> > > LETBET doesn't seem to me quite right. It seems to imply the WG
> would
> > > only work on a very limited subset of work from its charter.
> > >
> > > Having said that I can't think off-hand of a name that does sum
> > things
> > > up. Was playing round with NASTY (network-aware scavenger 
> transport) 
> > > but that has the same problem as the above. I would love 
> to fit it 
> > > to something like YIELD or GIVEWAY that sums up the idea in its
> acronym.
> > 
> > I personally liked the suggestion someone else made earlier 
> of "BACK- 
> > OFF" - meaning "Background Congestion Kontrol of File Flows" or 
> > something like that, wasn't it...?  (Maybe we could come up with an 
> > alternate word for the second 'F' that doesn't make it sound so 
> > narrowly scoped.)
> > 
> > Bryan
> > 
> > >
> > >
> > > Toby
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On
> Behalf
> > > Of
> > >> Ingemar Johansson S
> > >> Sent: 22 October 2008 06:49
> > >> To: Ted Faber; Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[VZ]
> > >> Cc: [e-mail]; [e-mail]; TSV Area
> > >> Subject: Re: [p2pi] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter
> > >>
> > >> Hi
> > >>
> > >> Even though I understand that it is better to focus on 
> the charter
> > > than
> > >> in the name I too beleieve that TANA does not say much.
> > >>
> > >> I believe that somewhere along the track and also in the charter
> the
> > >> term "less than best effort transmission" was/is mentioned A 
> > >> possible name would then be
> > >>
> > >> LETBET (LEss Than Best Effort Transport)
> > >>
> > >> That said... there are a whole bunch of WG names out 
> there that at 
> > >> first glance does not say anything about the group.
> > >>
> > >> The charter looks OK from my perspective.
> > >>
> > >> /Ingemar
> > >>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: [e-mail]
> > >>> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Ted Faber
> > >>> Sent: den 21 oktober 2008 18:51
> > >>> To: Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[VZ]
> > >>> Cc: TSV Area; [e-mail]; [e-mail]
> > >>> Subject: Re: [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter
> > >>>
> > >>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 09:12:10AM -0500, Eddy, Wesley M.
> > >>> (GRC-RCN0)[VZ] wrote:
> > >>>> But if nobody else has a problem with the TANA name, 
> I'll keep my 
> > >>>> mouth shut so we don't waste time and energy.  There are
> > >>> bigger fish to fry!
> > >>>
> > >>> It should change.
> > >>>
> > >>> I care about congestion control and nothing in the expansion of 
> > >>> TANA indicated it was about congestion (to me).
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Ted Faber
> > >>> http://www.isi.edu/~faber           PGP:
> > >>> http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
> > >>> Unexpected attachment on this mail? See 
> > >>> http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
> > >>>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> p2pi mailing list
> > >> [e-mail]
> > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > tana mailing list
> > > [e-mail]
> > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tana
> 
> _______________________________________________
> tana mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tana
> 
_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
[e-mail]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi