IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [p2pi] [tana] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter

"Narayanan, Vidya" <vidyan@qualcomm.com> Tue, 21 October 2008 19:13 UTC

Return-Path: <p2pi-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: p2pi-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-p2pi-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1C2128C197; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:13:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C07B28C133; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:13:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.186
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.186 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.587, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NkfJBB+TFnkV; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com (wolverine02.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01463A6B8E; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:13:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=vidyan@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1224616505; x=1256152505; h=from:to:cc:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator: acceptlanguage:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version:x-ironport-av; z=From:=20"Narayanan,=20Vidya"=20<vidyan@qualcomm.com>|To: =20Nicholas=20Weaver=20<nweaver@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>|CC:=20 Stanislav=20Shalunov=20<shalunov@shlang.com>,=20TSV=20Are a=20<tsv-area@ietf.org>,=0D=0A=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20"ta na@ietf.org"=20<tana@ietf.org>,=20"p2pi@ietf.org"=20<p2pi @ietf.org>,=0D=0A=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20"Eddy,=0D=0A=20W esley=20M.=20(GRC-RCN0)[VZ]"=20<Wesley.M.Eddy@nasa.gov> |Date:=20Tue,=2021=20Oct=202008=2012:14:59=20-0700 |Subject:=20RE:=20[p2pi]=20[tana]=20=20[tsv-area]=20TANA =20proposed=20charter|Thread-Topic:=20[p2pi]=20[tana]=20 =20[tsv-area]=20TANA=20proposed=20charter|Thread-Index: =20AckzrfLmZQY1ELVSTK+ZxrtKaRzi3AAAzvAQ|Message-ID:=20<BE 82361A0E26874DBC2ED1BA244866B9284E771E@NALASEXMB08.na.qua lcomm.com>|References:=20<AE465507-305C-41A4-BE95-311BB62 8064B@shlang.com>=0D=0A=20<B5A5E01F9387F4409E67604C0257C7 1E660E5F@NDJSEVS25A.ndc.nasa.gov>=0D=0A=20<36BFC323-FDD5- 42DD-9A17-F32DDE7DDF5E@cisco.com>=0D=0A=20<9F472A6A-F3F3- 4616-9ACE-4BD24D77FBCD@icsi.berkeley.edu>=0D=0A=20<19AE9A F4-E857-41EF-BF3E-B831F4EB8159@shlang.com>=0D=0A=20<4D4C2 826-077A-4948-9A92-5EC393DC88AF@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>=0D=0A =20<BE82361A0E26874DBC2ED1BA244866B9284E7711@NALASEXMB08. na.qualcomm.com>=0D=0A=20<086D03E5-61BE-43F5-A750-3539AF4 7F13E@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>|In-Reply-To:=20<086D03E5-61BE-43 F5-A750-3539AF47F13E@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>|Accept-Language: =20en-US|Content-Language:=20en-US|X-MS-Has-Attach: |X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:|acceptlanguage:=20en-US |Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20charset=3D"us-ascii" |Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted-printable |MIME-Version:=201.0|X-IronPort-AV:=20E=3DMcAfee=3Bi=3D"5 300,2777,5411"=3B=20a=3D"11138575"; bh=QcMH0hJrvEfcNxe4JVHsvQrP4SKDea3A34EYOc91c5M=; b=UPF/epjAejIOanMqNqDqTKu2xS8PA4S7oWN0KQawih8jsgjGdSHAQCfS n1RKjWm6WFHWtefRa3oGRX4MyVTu18gnc/VngcPFl19zYp5LvskV2ELkw fPbis+jslNQa2/8YjOm0oVNLrf554ultPKyyUWwK7/nIONFQ2mHLon72R o=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5300,2777,5411"; a="11138575"
Received: from pdmz-ns-mip.qualcomm.com (HELO ithilien.qualcomm.com) ([199.106.114.10]) by wolverine02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 21 Oct 2008 12:15:04 -0700
Received: from hamtaro.qualcomm.com (hamtaro.qualcomm.com [129.46.61.157]) by ithilien.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id m9LJF3X3029344 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:15:04 -0700
Received: from nasanexhc01.na.qualcomm.com (nasanexhc01.na.qualcomm.com [172.30.37.21]) by hamtaro.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id m9LJF2Nx028013 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:15:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nasanexhub01.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.93.121) by nasanexhc01.na.qualcomm.com (172.30.37.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.311.2; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:15:02 -0700
Received: from nalasexhub01.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.130.49) by nasanexhub01.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.93.121) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.311.2; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:15:01 -0700
Received: from NALASEXMB08.na.qualcomm.com ([10.47.16.12]) by nalasexhub01.na.qualcomm.com ([10.47.130.49]) with mapi; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:15:00 -0700
From: "Narayanan, Vidya" <vidyan@qualcomm.com>
To: Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:14:59 -0700
Thread-Topic: [p2pi] [tana] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter
Thread-Index: AckzrfLmZQY1ELVSTK+ZxrtKaRzi3AAAzvAQ
Message-ID: <BE82361A0E26874DBC2ED1BA244866B9284E771E@NALASEXMB08.na.qualcomm.com>
References: <AE465507-305C-41A4-BE95-311BB628064B@shlang.com> <B5A5E01F9387F4409E67604C0257C71E660E5F@NDJSEVS25A.ndc.nasa.gov> <36BFC323-FDD5-42DD-9A17-F32DDE7DDF5E@cisco.com> <9F472A6A-F3F3-4616-9ACE-4BD24D77FBCD@icsi.berkeley.edu> <19AE9AF4-E857-41EF-BF3E-B831F4EB8159@shlang.com> <4D4C2826-077A-4948-9A92-5EC393DC88AF@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> <BE82361A0E26874DBC2ED1BA244866B9284E7711@NALASEXMB08.na.qualcomm.com> <086D03E5-61BE-43F5-A750-3539AF47F13E@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
In-Reply-To: <086D03E5-61BE-43F5-A750-3539AF47F13E@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "p2pi@ietf.org" <p2pi@ietf.org>, "tana@ietf.org" <tana@ietf.org>, TSV Area <tsv-area@ietf.org>, "Eddy, Wesley M. \(GRC-RCN0\)\[VZ\]" <Wesley.M.Eddy@nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: [p2pi] [tana] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter
X-BeenThere: p2pi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: P2P Infrastructure Discussion <p2pi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/p2pi>
List-Post: <mailto:p2pi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org

Re-sending due to some earlier errors.. Sorry about the multiple copies to some of you.  

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicholas Weaver [mailto:nweaver@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 11:51 AM
> To: Narayanan, Vidya
> Cc: Nicholas Weaver; Stanislav Shalunov; TSV Area; tana@ietf.org; 
> p2pi@ietf.org; Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[VZ]
> Subject: Re: [p2pi] [tana] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter
> 
> 
> On Oct 21, 2008, at 11:33 AM, Narayanan, Vidya wrote:
> 
> > I'll start by saying that I do like the charter and believe
> that it is
> > scoped correctly.
> >
> > I do, however, share some of the concerns that Nicholas has
> raised.   
> > We are talking about bulk data p2p transfers here, not necessarily 
> > just limited to file transfers.  This does mean p2p models
> of video,
> > games that exchange large amounts of data (e.g., World of
> Warcraft),
> > large medical data (e.g., high resolution imaging) transfer, etc.
> > fall into this category.  Of course, for some of these
> applications,
> > the answer may simply be that TANA is not applicable and
> hence, should
> > not be used.  However, I do think there are more grades to this.
> 
> Well, it also depends too:
> 
> The medical data is point to point, not P2P.  A single TCP flow works 
> well, and by being on real network, shouldn't experience the buffer 
> issues present in home gateways, and by being a single flow, doesn't 
> have the congestion-monopolization properties that P2P transfer 
> programs have.
> 
> Warcraft is not using P2P for playing, rather it is using P2P to save 
> money in the data transfer of "patches", which include large amounts 
> of content (textures, models, etc) (thus my rant on cost shifting).
> 

I was not necessarily talking about the application models that exist today alone, but, was trying to see how future-proof this work can be.  But, world of warcraft is probably not the right example here :) 

Vidya
_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email