IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [p2pi] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter

Murari Sridharan <muraris@microsoft.com> Tue, 21 October 2008 20:28 UTC

Return-Path: <p2pi-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: p2pi-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-p2pi-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6F5B28C1CB; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:28:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615303A6A92; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:03:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lT0BiFYV9aUC; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (mail3.microsoft.com [131.107.115.214]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9094C3A69D9; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:03:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tk1-exhub-c102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.46.186) by TK5-EXGWY-E803.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.169) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.291.1; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:05:04 -0700
Received: from NA-EXMSG-C110.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.62.150]) by tk1-exhub-c102.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.46.186]) with mapi; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:05:04 -0700
From: Murari Sridharan <muraris@microsoft.com>
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>, "ext Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[VZ]" <Wesley.M.Eddy@nasa.gov>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:05:02 -0700
Thread-Topic: [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter
Thread-Index: Ackzje0SmIwJ7D23Qcy0xOrkwgQaQwACGOVg
Message-ID: <FCA794787FDE0D4DBE9FFA11053ECEB612D976B141@NA-EXMSG-C110.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <AE465507-305C-41A4-BE95-311BB628064B@shlang.com> <B5A5E01F9387F4409E67604C0257C71E660E5F@NDJSEVS25A.ndc.nasa.gov> <71ACFD76-A76F-4CCD-B675-BA5A984976BE@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <71ACFD76-A76F-4CCD-B675-BA5A984976BE@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 13:28:30 -0700
Cc: "p2pi@ietf.org" <p2pi@ietf.org>, "tana@ietf.org" <tana@ietf.org>, TSV Area <tsv-area@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [p2pi] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter
X-BeenThere: p2pi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: P2P Infrastructure Discussion <p2pi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/p2pi>
List-Post: <mailto:p2pi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org

Isn't the goal here to achieve lower than best-effort, so essentially "Low Priority TCP", assuming non-TCP traffic flows E2E we can make it more general and call it "Congestion control for low priority flows"

Murari

-----Original Message-----
From: tsv-area-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tsv-area-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Lars Eggert
Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 11:01 AM
To: ext Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[VZ]
Cc: TSV Area; tana@ietf.org; p2pi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter

Hi,

On 2008-10-21, at 10:12, ext Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[VZ] wrote:
> The charter, as written looks reasonable to me.  I just hate the name
> :).

the name was an ad hoc creation, and when it was picked, some of the
stuff that ended up being ALTO was part of the TANA scope - so it
needed to be broader.

If we can come up with a better name I'm all ears (and you make
several good suggestions below). What I'd like to avoid is a long
discussion about a text string, when what I'd rather like to see is a
discussion on whether the work we're going to attempt is reasonable.

Lars

> It should really be something like:
> "Minimizing Impact of Large Transfers" (MILT)
> "Concurrent Realtime And Bulk Applications" (CRABA)
> "Fast Transfers Adding Minimal Latency" (FTAML)
> "Bulk And Realtime Flows Interacting as Good Neighbors" (BARFIGN) --
> probably not a good one as it looks too much like "barfing" :)

I'm pretty sure CRABA would also have interesting soundex matches...

_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email