IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [p2pi] Follow-Up from Comcast Presentation

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Sat, 07 June 2008 17:48 UTC

Return-Path: <p2pi-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: p2pi-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-p2pi-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777CD3A6B43; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 10:48:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C4B3A67A7 for <p2pi@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 10:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5ZjUaEWqmHSS for <p2pi@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 10:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17DB23A6AF2 for <p2pi@ietf.org>; Sat, 7 Jun 2008 10:48:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (pool-71-106-109-69.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.106.109.69]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m57HmSwu020485 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 7 Jun 2008 10:48:30 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <484AC9EB.8060501@isi.edu>
Date: Sat, 07 Jun 2008 10:48:27 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
References: <45AEC6EF95942140888406588E1A6602045CBA5E@PACDCEXCMB04.cable.comcast.com> <3efc39a60806061909n11a65eafnce88df7c73c30639@mail.gmail.com> <4CB75CEA-FE7E-4398-A1B3-A03DBF5063D3@icsi.berkeley.edu> <3efc39a60806070852p49f6a066y27e804fd5d4cf989@mail.gmail.com> <20080607173925.GJ8579@verdi>
In-Reply-To: <20080607173925.GJ8579@verdi>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: p2pi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [p2pi] Follow-Up from Comcast Presentation
X-BeenThere: p2pi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: P2P Infrastructure Discussion <p2pi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/p2pi>
List-Post: <mailto:p2pi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1345081010=="
Sender: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org


John Leslie wrote:
> Robb Topolski <robb@funchords.com> wrote:
>> Best-effort is the baseline expectation of innovators creating products
>> for the Internet -- even with some congestion thrown in.  They design
>> their products to work in such a network.  They cannot expect that
>> network operators will invent worse-than-best-effort class that
>> dramatically changes the characteristics of the network from one moment
>> to the next.
> 
>    I strongly recommend we avoid the term "worse-than-best-effort" --
> it is unlikely we can agree on a common meaning for it.

Least effort?

Joe


_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email