Re: [p2pi] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter

Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com> Tue, 21 October 2008 14:59 UTC

Return-Path: <p2pi-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: p2pi-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-p2pi-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD113A6B2F; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 07:59:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9AC3A6B2F; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 07:59:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.587
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.587 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.012, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q4VmkYeOGie1; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 07:59:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.fit.nokia.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:2060:40:1::123]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 326DB3A6943; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 07:59:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [172.17.157.161] ([12.157.84.6]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.fit.nokia.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id m9LF0gXa083618 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:00:44 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from lars.eggert@nokia.com)
Message-Id: <71ACFD76-A76F-4CCD-B675-BA5A984976BE@nokia.com>
From: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
To: "ext Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[VZ]" <Wesley.M.Eddy@nasa.gov>
In-Reply-To: <B5A5E01F9387F4409E67604C0257C71E660E5F@NDJSEVS25A.ndc.nasa.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v929.2)
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 11:00:42 -0400
References: <AE465507-305C-41A4-BE95-311BB628064B@shlang.com> <B5A5E01F9387F4409E67604C0257C71E660E5F@NDJSEVS25A.ndc.nasa.gov>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.929.2)
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94/8459/Tue Oct 21 15:24:15 2008 on fit.nokia.com
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (mail.fit.nokia.com [212.213.221.39]); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 18:00:51 +0300 (EEST)
Cc: TSV Area <tsv-area@ietf.org>, tana@ietf.org, p2pi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [p2pi] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter
X-BeenThere: p2pi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: P2P Infrastructure Discussion <p2pi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/p2pi>
List-Post: <mailto:p2pi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"; DelSp="yes"
Sender: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

On 2008-10-21, at 10:12, ext Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[VZ] wrote:
> The charter, as written looks reasonable to me.  I just hate the name
> :).

the name was an ad hoc creation, and when it was picked, some of the  
stuff that ended up being ALTO was part of the TANA scope - so it  
needed to be broader.

If we can come up with a better name I'm all ears (and you make  
several good suggestions below). What I'd like to avoid is a long  
discussion about a text string, when what I'd rather like to see is a  
discussion on whether the work we're going to attempt is reasonable.

Lars

> It should really be something like:
> "Minimizing Impact of Large Transfers" (MILT)
> "Concurrent Realtime And Bulk Applications" (CRABA)
> "Fast Transfers Adding Minimal Latency" (FTAML)
> "Bulk And Realtime Flows Interacting as Good Neighbors" (BARFIGN) --
> probably not a good one as it looks too much like "barfing" :)

I'm pretty sure CRABA would also have interesting soundex matches...
_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi