Re: [p2pi] [tana] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter

On Oct 21, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Joe Touch wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
>
>
> Lars Eggert wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2008-10-21, at 10:12, ext Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[VZ] wrote:
>>> The charter, as written looks reasonable to me.  I just hate the  
>>> name
>>> :).
>>
>> the name was an ad hoc creation, and when it was picked, some of the
>> stuff that ended up being ALTO was part of the TANA scope - so it  
>> needed
>> to be broader.
>>
>> If we can come up with a better name I'm all ears (and you make  
>> several
>> good suggestions below). What I'd like to avoid is a long discussion
>> about a text string, when what I'd rather like to see is a  
>> discussion on
>> whether the work we're going to attempt is reasonable.
>>
>> Lars
>>
>>> It should really be something like:
>>> "Minimizing Impact of Large Transfers" (MILT)
>>> "Concurrent Realtime And Bulk Applications" (CRABA)
>>> "Fast Transfers Adding Minimal Latency" (FTAML)
>>> "Bulk And Realtime Flows Interacting as Good Neighbors" (BARFIGN) --
>>> probably not a good one as it looks too much like "barfing" :)
>
> FWIW, it seems like "background TCP" is what you want (BTCP); granted,
> that's already a spec'd protocol ;-)
>
> Maybe, more generally, Background Congestion Control (BACK-CC)?
>

Background Congestion Control of File Flows (BACK-OFF) ?

Regards
Marshall

>
> Joe
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAkj99+EACgkQE5f5cImnZrvY9ACgxGAeY/J4lMtZvxEht+/gxdfx
> KDUAniB8eeoRz0Z4HDyDBCGbKAHtAVvn
> =KTqj
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> tana mailing list
> tana@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tana

_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi