Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)

Laird Popkin <laird@pando.com> Fri, 10 October 2008 19:38 UTC

Return-Path: <p2pi-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: p2pi-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-p2pi-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AE2F3A68FB; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:38:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461823A68FB; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:38:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.264
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.264 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HABEAS_ACCREDITED_COI=-8, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id lpqjYhUVhQ59; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:37:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dkny.pando.com (dkny.pando.com [67.99.55.163]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE0983A68F4; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:37:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by dkny.pando.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F624E10C70; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:38:44 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
Received: from dkny.pando.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dkny.pando.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id D4QmI6juxEYs; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:38:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from dkny.pando.com (dkny.pando.com [10.10.60.11]) by dkny.pando.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F6FE10D7A; Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:38:33 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 15:38:32 -0400 (EDT)
From: Laird Popkin <laird@pando.com>
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa.dusseault@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <327895541.358291223667512976.JavaMail.root@dkny.pando.com>
In-Reply-To: <1991192280.358241223667338374.JavaMail.root@dkny.pando.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Originating-IP: [10.10.20.77]
Cc: p2pi@ietf.org, IESG IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
X-BeenThere: p2pi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: P2P Infrastructure Discussion <p2pi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/p2pi>
List-Post: <mailto:p2pi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0676325747=="
Sender: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org

On a related note, I'd like to make sure that you guys know that, as we discussed in Dublin, the P4P Working Group is in the process of documenting the P4P protocol as used in our field tests, which we would like to offer to the ALTO group as input into the ALTO process. Our hope is to have this ready for the next IETF meeting. 

- Laird Popkin, CTO, Pando Networks 
  mobile: 646/465-0570 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa.dusseault@gmail.com> 
To: "Lakshminath Dondeti" <ldondeti@qualcomm.com> 
Cc: p2pi@ietf.org, "IESG IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>rg>, ietf@ietf.org 
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 3:21:02 PM (GMT-0500) America/New_York 
Subject: Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto) 


Lakshminath and Vidya, 

Vijay, Enrico and Stefano have said what I was going to say (e.g. below) -- as sponsoring AD for this charter I've been following the WG discussion, working with the rest of the IESG, and talking to people to confirm that there's better consensus on the list, even if there was confusion at the BOF.  This IETF Last Call is also part of confirming whether there's now consensus. 

It's difficult to write a charter without actually designing the solution. What would help with the charter, even now, is for people to write up proposals for the solution -- ideally in the form of Internet-Drafts.  I haven't yet selected chairs for the WG, so as you can imagine editors and authors aren't yet selected.  It would be most excellent to see some individual proposals before a committee gets their hands on them :) 

Lisa 




On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:36 AM, Vijay K. Gurbani < vkg@alcatel-lucent.com > wrote: 


 ... 



And since the BoF, much has changed to narrow the scope of the 
charter down to more manageable pieces as well as establish a 
channel with IRTF to move certain aspects of the work there 
(as the timeline in my previous email indicated.) 




Lakshminath Dondeti wrote: 
  


My perception and my understanding of some of the dissenting opinions 
was that some of those need to be worked out before creating a working group. 

But I believe that we have done exactly that: the list has been 
busy since Dublin on attempts to move the work forward in a manner 
that is conducive to all participants. 




_______________________________________________ p2pi mailing list p2pi@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi
_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi