Re: [p2pi] [tana] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter

Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com> Wed, 22 October 2008 07:10 UTC

Return-Path: <p2pi-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: p2pi-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-p2pi-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CA593A69BB; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA72C3A68D8; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:10:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.129
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.129 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.120, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XtaXEMZXKrbW; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (mailgw4.ericsson.se [193.180.251.62]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 556823A67ED; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 00:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw4.ericsson.se (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 5AEB82106D; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:10:34 +0200 (CEST)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3e-aa77dbb00000537b-02-48fed1eae3a6
Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se (unknown [153.88.254.124]) by mailgw4.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with ESMTP id 1CBA92191E; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:10:34 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.254.177]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:10:33 +0200
Received: from mail.lmf.ericsson.se ([131.160.11.50]) by esealmw129.eemea.ericsson.se with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 22 Oct 2008 09:10:33 +0200
Received: from nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se [131.160.33.3]) by mail.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6331A265E; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:10:33 +0300 (EEST)
Received: from n75.nomadiclab.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by nomadiclab.lmf.ericsson.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061924DC85; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:10:32 +0300 (EEST)
Message-ID: <48FED1E8.7080101@ericsson.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 10:10:32 +0300
From: Salvatore Loreto <salvatore.loreto@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (X11/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: menth@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de
References: <AE465507-305C-41A4-BE95-311BB628064B@shlang.com><B5A5E01F9387F4409E67604C0257C71E660E5F@NDJSEVS25A.ndc.nasa.gov> <20081021165051.GA64367@zod.isi.edu> <026F8EEDAD2C4342A993203088C1FC05088E47F0@esealmw109.eemea.ericsson.se> <48FEC5C9.6060101@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
In-Reply-To: <48FEC5C9.6060101@informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Oct 2008 07:10:33.0542 (UTC) FILETIME=[4650AE60:01C93415]
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: tana@ietf.org, Ted Faber <faber@ISI.EDU>, p2pi@ietf.org, Ingemar Johansson S <ingemar.s.johansson@ericsson.com>, TSV Area <tsv-area@ietf.org>, "Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[VZ]" <Wesley.M.Eddy@nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: [p2pi] [tana] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter
X-BeenThere: p2pi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: P2P Infrastructure Discussion <p2pi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/p2pi>
List-Post: <mailto:p2pi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed"
Sender: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org

Hi,

I also think the charter is very well scoped.

However I'd like to see the *multiple connections* work item elaborated 
and explained a little bit more!

about the name proposal both "LETBET (LEss Than Best Effort Transport)" and
"Scavenger Network Congestion Protocols" sound good proposal to me.

/sal

Michael Menth wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I also find the charter good and like Ingemar's name proposal "LETBET 
> (LEss Than Best Effort Transport)"
>
> Michael
>
> Ingemar Johansson S wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> Even though I understand that it is better to focus on the charter than
>> in the name I too beleieve that TANA does not say much.
>>
>> I believe that somewhere along the track and also in the charter the
>> term "less than best effort transmission" was/is mentioned
>> A possible name would then be
>> LETBET (LEss Than Best Effort Transport)
>>
>> That said... there are a whole bunch of WG names out there that at first
>> glance does not say anything about the group.
>> The charter looks OK from my perspective.
>>
>> /Ingemar
>>
>>  
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: tsv-area-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tsv-area-bounces@ietf.org] 
>>> On Behalf Of Ted Faber
>>> Sent: den 21 oktober 2008 18:51
>>> To: Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[VZ]
>>> Cc: TSV Area; tana@ietf.org; p2pi@ietf.org
>>> Subject: Re: [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 09:12:10AM -0500, Eddy, Wesley M. 
>>> (GRC-RCN0)[VZ] wrote:
>>>    
>>>> But if nobody else has a problem with the TANA name, I'll keep my 
>>>> mouth shut so we don't waste time and energy.  There are       
>>> bigger fish to fry!
>>>
>>> It should change.
>>>
>>> I care about congestion control and nothing in the expansion of TANA 
>>> indicated it was about congestion (to me).
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> Ted Faber
>>> http://www.isi.edu/~faber           PGP: 
>>> http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
>>> Unexpected attachment on this mail? See 
>>> http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
>>>
>>>     
>> _______________________________________________
>> tana mailing list
>> tana@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tana
>>   
>

_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi