Re: [p2pi] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter

Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org> Thu, 23 October 2008 15:14 UTC

Return-Path: <p2pi-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: p2pi-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-p2pi-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A055C3A6A30; Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAA6E3A68A8; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.399
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.399 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.200, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wAu1COmyG9HG; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pork.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (pork.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU [192.150.186.19]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E05B3A6358; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:48:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from guns.icir.org (adsl-69-222-35-58.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net [69.222.35.58]) by pork.ICSI.Berkeley.EDU (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id m9N3maHB023055; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 20:48:36 -0700
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (adsl-69-222-35-58.dsl.bcvloh.ameritech.net [69.222.35.58]) by guns.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E7F35D00CC; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:47:40 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from lawyers.icir.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lawyers.icir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A87974404; Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:48:29 -0400 (EDT)
To: Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
From: Mark Allman <mallman@icir.org>
In-Reply-To: <4D4C2826-077A-4948-9A92-5EC393DC88AF@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>
Organization: International Computer Science Institute (ICSI)
Song-of-the-Day: I'm No Angel
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2008 23:48:29 -0400
Message-Id: <20081023034829.62A87974404@lawyers.icir.org>
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 08:14:16 -0700
Cc: TSV Area <tsv-area@ietf.org>, tana@ietf.org, p2pi@ietf.org, "Eddy, Wesley M. \(GRC-RCN0\)\[VZ\]" <Wesley.M.Eddy@nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: [p2pi] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter
X-BeenThere: p2pi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: mallman@icir.org
List-Id: P2P Infrastructure Discussion <p2pi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/p2pi>
List-Post: <mailto:p2pi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0229605546=="
Sender: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org

> Or at least until you bribe the NAT box vendors to implement some
> active queue management.
 
That might in fact be something desirable from a user's point of view
and so the bribe might not be too big.  It's the general notion sketched
in this paper:

  Dan Ardelean, Ethan Blanton, Maxim Martynov. Remote Active Queue
  Management. Proceedings of the ACM SIGMM NOSSDAV 2008. May 2008.
  http://www.cs.purdue.edu/homes/eblanton/publications/raqm.ps

allman



_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi