Re: [p2pi] [tana] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter

"Narayanan, Vidya" <vidyan@qualcomm.com> Tue, 21 October 2008 19:14 UTC

Return-Path: <p2pi-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: p2pi-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-p2pi-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478D728C133; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E657E3A6B8F; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.16
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.16 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.561, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mexPmLHSJ6No; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com (wolverine02.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D8428C133; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:14:24 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=vidyan@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1224616540; x=1256152540; h=from:to:cc:date:subject:thread-topic:thread-index: message-id:references:in-reply-to:accept-language: content-language:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator: acceptlanguage:content-type:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version:x-ironport-av; z=From:=20"Narayanan,=20Vidya"=20<vidyan@qualcomm.com>|To: =20Lars=20Eggert=20<lars.eggert@nokia.com>|CC:=20Nicholas =20Weaver=20<nweaver@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>,=0D=0A=20=20=20 =20=20=20=20=20Stanislav=20Shalunov=0D=0A=09<shalunov@shl ang.com>,=0D=0A=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20TSV=20Area=20<tsv- area@ietf.org>,=20"tana@ietf.org"=0D=0A=09<tana@ietf.org> ,=0D=0A=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20"p2pi@ietf.org"=20<p2pi@ie tf.org>,=0D=0A=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20"Eddy,=20Wesley=20M .=0D=0A=20(GRC-RCN0)[VZ]"=20<Wesley.M.Eddy@nasa.gov>,=0D =0A=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20Bruce=20Davie=20<bdavie@cisco. com>|Date:=20Tue,=2021=20Oct=202008=2012:15:35=20-0700 |Subject:=20RE:=20[tana]=20[p2pi]=20[tsv-area]=20TANA=20p roposed=20charter|Thread-Topic:=20[tana]=20[p2pi]=20[tsv- area]=20TANA=20proposed=20charter|Thread-Index:=20Ackzrnc owLH5GLYYTk2utGnctUsH/QAAtshA|Message-ID:=20<BE82361A0E26 874DBC2ED1BA244866B9284E771F@NALASEXMB08.na.qualcomm.com> |References:=20<AE465507-305C-41A4-BE95-311BB628064B@shla ng.com>=0D=0A=20<B5A5E01F9387F4409E67604C0257C71E660E5F@N DJSEVS25A.ndc.nasa.gov>=0D=0A=20<36BFC323-FDD5-42DD-9A17- F32DDE7DDF5E@cisco.com>=0D=0A=20<9F472A6A-F3F3-4616-9ACE- 4BD24D77FBCD@icsi.berkeley.edu>=0D=0A=20<19AE9AF4-E857-41 EF-BF3E-B831F4EB8159@shlang.com>=0D=0A=20<4D4C2826-077A-4 948-9A92-5EC393DC88AF@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>=0D=0A=20<BE82361 A0E26874DBC2ED1BA244866B9284E7711@NALASEXMB08.na.qualcomm .com>=0D=0A=20<E65F8337-902C-4474-BB79-E5680DEEC66A@nokia .com>|In-Reply-To:=20<E65F8337-902C-4474-BB79-E5680DEEC66 A@nokia.com>|Accept-Language:=20en-US|Content-Language: =20en-US|X-MS-Has-Attach:|X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: |acceptlanguage:=20en-US|Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B=20 charset=3D"us-ascii"|Content-Transfer-Encoding:=20quoted- printable|MIME-Version:=201.0|X-IronPort-AV:=20E=3DMcAfee =3Bi=3D"5300,2777,5411"=3B=20a=3D"11138589"; bh=bUpkV2bTYyapoNgSmzBcFK9J4dXniZHce9MA7YZGScY=; b=ZUe6z59i2b5D0NRMo2+WpB8RlvtCDfChgCp1zcVIbOXaL0L5BUiqRSaM 5Lz3OI+sLq7oCkJ00yaNsRb8TD0O62l9XMNC2LuulV5YDbcO8hb2XOCn5 zm06buYewoFEwmfrKPDAXmVH9swenwnPkBYX0Tj55DO5lfk22MHm1biuU 0=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5300,2777,5411"; a="11138589"
Received: from pdmz-ns-mip.qualcomm.com (HELO ithilien.qualcomm.com) ([199.106.114.10]) by wolverine02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 21 Oct 2008 12:15:39 -0700
Received: from msgtransport05.qualcomm.com (msgtransport05.qualcomm.com [129.46.61.150]) by ithilien.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id m9LJFdYO029396 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:15:39 -0700
Received: from nasanexhc01.na.qualcomm.com (nasanexhc01.na.qualcomm.com [172.30.37.21]) by msgtransport05.qualcomm.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/1.0) with ESMTP id m9LJFcDK022058 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:15:38 -0700
Received: from nasanexhub03.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.93.98) by nasanexhc01.na.qualcomm.com (172.30.37.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.311.2; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:15:38 -0700
Received: from nalasexhub04.na.qualcomm.com (10.47.130.55) by nasanexhub03.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.93.98) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.311.2; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:15:38 -0700
Received: from NALASEXMB08.na.qualcomm.com ([10.47.16.12]) by nalasexhub04.na.qualcomm.com ([10.47.130.55]) with mapi; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:15:37 -0700
From: "Narayanan, Vidya" <vidyan@qualcomm.com>
To: Lars Eggert <lars.eggert@nokia.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 12:15:35 -0700
Thread-Topic: [tana] [p2pi] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter
Thread-Index: AckzrncowLH5GLYYTk2utGnctUsH/QAAtshA
Message-ID: <BE82361A0E26874DBC2ED1BA244866B9284E771F@NALASEXMB08.na.qualcomm.com>
References: <AE465507-305C-41A4-BE95-311BB628064B@shlang.com> <B5A5E01F9387F4409E67604C0257C71E660E5F@NDJSEVS25A.ndc.nasa.gov> <36BFC323-FDD5-42DD-9A17-F32DDE7DDF5E@cisco.com> <9F472A6A-F3F3-4616-9ACE-4BD24D77FBCD@icsi.berkeley.edu> <19AE9AF4-E857-41EF-BF3E-B831F4EB8159@shlang.com> <4D4C2826-077A-4948-9A92-5EC393DC88AF@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU> <BE82361A0E26874DBC2ED1BA244866B9284E7711@NALASEXMB08.na.qualcomm.com> <E65F8337-902C-4474-BB79-E5680DEEC66A@nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <E65F8337-902C-4474-BB79-E5680DEEC66A@nokia.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "tana@ietf.org" <tana@ietf.org>, Nicholas Weaver <nweaver@ICSI.Berkeley.EDU>, "p2pi@ietf.org" <p2pi@ietf.org>, TSV Area <tsv-area@ietf.org>, "Eddy, Wesley M. \(GRC-RCN0\)\[VZ\]" <Wesley.M.Eddy@nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: [p2pi] [tana] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter
X-BeenThere: p2pi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: P2P Infrastructure Discussion <p2pi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/p2pi>
List-Post: <mailto:p2pi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org

Speaking for TANA, I do think it is nicely scoped to a good problem.  I was bringing up some points to consider within the scope of the current charter - or, are you saying that the current charter is only meant to be scoped to file transfer applications?  

Vidya 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lars Eggert [mailto:lars.eggert@nokia.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2008 11:53 AM
> To: Narayanan, Vidya
> Cc: Nicholas Weaver; Stanislav Shalunov; TSV Area; tana@ietf.org; 
> p2pi@ietf.org; Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[VZ]; Bruce Davie
> Subject: Re: [tana] [p2pi] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter
> 
> Hi,
> 
> the goal for TANA and ALTO was to identify some subsets of the overall 
> problem space that are sufficiently well understood that we can start 
> to architect solutions. (And limit ourselves to those subsets where 
> the IETF would be an appropriate body for this work.)
> 
> There are certainly other parts of this problem that may be ripe for 
> discussion in the IETF, and chartering TANA and ALTO by no means 
> precludes this discussion from happening. I fully expect the IETF to 
> take on additional work related to this general problem space in the 
> future - we just had to start somewhere, and TANA and ALTO is where we 
> started.
> 
> I'd strongly encourage folks that want to push forward additional 
> proposals for the IETF to take on in this space!
> 
> Lars
> 
> On 2008-10-21, at 14:33, ext Narayanan, Vidya wrote:
> > I'll start by saying that I do like the charter and believe
> that it is
> > scoped correctly.
> >
> > I do, however, share some of the concerns that Nicholas has
> raised.   
> > We are talking about bulk data p2p transfers here, not necessarily 
> > just limited to file transfers.  This does mean p2p models
> of video,
> > games that exchange large amounts of data (e.g., World of
> Warcraft),
> > large medical data (e.g., high resolution imaging) transfer, etc.
> > fall into this category.  Of course, for some of these
> applications,
> > the answer may simply be that TANA is not applicable and
> hence, should
> > not be used.  However, I do think there are more grades to this.
> >
> > Another interesting piece of data is that for the first
> time in many
> > years, http has overtaken p2p traffic in some markets, primarily 
> > driven by video download applications such as YouTube.
> Thanks to http
> > being the common firewall transport mechanism, much of the
> video now
> > runs over TCP.  So, is it really as cut and dry as the bulk
> data P2P
> > traffic needing to yield to Internet traffic?  As long as
> it is about
> > some background file transfer, perhaps that philosophy will
> just work.  
> > But, if the P2P app is also a video app, the answer is
> probably more
> > complex.
> >
> > There is no doubt that this charter is attempting to tackle a very 
> > important issue.  But, it would be good to think about what
> grades we
> > may need to address here.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Vidya
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi