Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [Was: Re: discussing P2PI-related standardization in Dublin]
Enrico Marocco <enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it> Fri, 13 June 2008 18:52 UTC
Return-Path: <p2pi-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: p2pi-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-p2pi-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDDED3A68CE; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:52:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859493A68E1 for <p2pi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:52:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.412
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.412 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.065, BAYES_00=-2.599, DATE_IN_FUTURE_24_48=3.196, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8u9KZuB0T5m9 for <p2pi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailm.telecomitalia.it (mailm.telecomitalia.it [217.169.121.53]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 325A73A68CE for <p2pi@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:52:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ptpxch008rm001.idc.cww.telecomitalia.it ([156.54.205.170]) by mailm.telecomitalia.it with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:53:20 +0200
Received: from grfhub701rm001.griffon.local ([10.19.3.8]) by ptpxch008rm001.idc.cww.telecomitalia.it with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:53:20 +0200
Received: from [172.16.82.18] (163.162.180.246) by smtp.telecomitalia.it (10.19.3.40) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.278.0; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 20:53:20 +0200
Message-ID: <485413A4.1060106@telecomitalia.it>
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2008 20:53:24 +0200
From: Enrico Marocco <enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it>
User-Agent: Mozilla-Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080509)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
References: <565621476.393261213359293462.JavaMail.root@dkny.pando.com> <4852862D.9030202@telecomitalia.it> <20080613151246.GA20314@nic.fr>
In-Reply-To: <20080613151246.GA20314@nic.fr>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jun 2008 18:53:20.0986 (UTC) FILETIME=[BFF4C3A0:01C8CD86]
Cc: "p2pi@ietf.org" <p2pi@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [Was: Re: discussing P2PI-related standardization in Dublin]
X-BeenThere: p2pi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: P2P Infrastructure Discussion <p2pi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/p2pi>
List-Post: <mailto:p2pi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0595096070=="
Sender: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > As a beginner in this list, I request more explanations. Reading > draft-marocco-alto-problem-statement-00, I had the impression that > ALTO only follows one approach, "optimizing traffic generated by P2P > applications Using Information Provided By Isps And Network > Operators" (section 1). Actually the draft was written a couple of months ago with much emphasis on ISP-based solutions. After several discussions, it has become clear that the same service could be effectively provided by third-parties. We'll try make it clearer in the next version of the draft. > I'm a big fan of ICS myself but are they really on-topic? Or is it too > early to say? The main goal here is to provide an interface to help p2p applications in the peer selection process. Whether such interface is implemented by an oracle deployed by some ISPs, or by a distributed coordinate system should be transparent to the standardization effort we are proposing. -- Ciao, Enrico
_______________________________________________ p2pi mailing list p2pi@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi
- Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [W… Enrico Marocco
- Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [W… Laird Popkin
- Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [W… stefano previdi
- Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [W… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [W… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [W… Laird Popkin
- Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [W… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [W… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [W… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [W… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [W… Laird Popkin
- Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [W… Vijay K. Gurbani
- Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [W… Enrico Marocco
- Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [W… Enrico Marocco
- Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [W… Laird Popkin
- Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [W… Y. R. Yang
- Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [W… Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [W… stefano previdi