Re: [p2pi] [tana] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter

Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU> Tue, 21 October 2008 16:22 UTC

Return-Path: <p2pi-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: p2pi-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-p2pi-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2603C3A6B5A; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:22:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA443A6B60; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:22:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5iinyOGRCwF0; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65DE33A6B46; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:22:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [70.213.149.171] (171.sub-70-213-149.myvzw.com [70.213.149.171]) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m9LGN4SH019262 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:23:07 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <48FE01E8.1090402@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:23:04 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@ISI.EDU>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.17 (Windows/20080914)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Marshall Eubanks <tme@multicasttech.com>
References: <AE465507-305C-41A4-BE95-311BB628064B@shlang.com> <B5A5E01F9387F4409E67604C0257C71E660E5F@NDJSEVS25A.ndc.nasa.gov> <71ACFD76-A76F-4CCD-B675-BA5A984976BE@nokia.com> <48FDF7E2.7050603@isi.edu> <0D46DABA-A743-48AF-8A9C-723A93FC0F0B@multicasttech.com>
In-Reply-To: <0D46DABA-A743-48AF-8A9C-723A93FC0F0B@multicasttech.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: TSV Area <tsv-area@ietf.org>, tana@ietf.org, p2pi@ietf.org, "ext Eddy, Wesley M. \(GRC-RCN0\)\[VZ\]" <Wesley.M.Eddy@nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: [p2pi] [tana] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter
X-BeenThere: p2pi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: P2P Infrastructure Discussion <p2pi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/p2pi>
List-Post: <mailto:p2pi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



Marshall Eubanks wrote:
> On Oct 21, 2008, at 11:40 AM, Joe Touch wrote:
...
> FWIW, it seems like "background TCP" is what you want (BTCP); granted,
> that's already a spec'd protocol ;-)
> 
> Maybe, more generally, Background Congestion Control (BACK-CC)?
> 
> 
>> Background Congestion Control of File Flows (BACK-OFF) ?

Maybe omit 'file' (there could be utility to non-file background
transfers), i.e.:

	Backgrounds OF Flows (BACK-OFF)

Joe
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iEYEARECAAYFAkj+AegACgkQE5f5cImnZrudEQCg/Mu+10EQi8OkzJDLq79PfPjb
rnAAn1LIuK9YJvDF5lvBG9w9puKGXHzZ
=QFUA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi