Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [Was: Re: discussing P2PI-related standardization in Dublin]

Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr> Fri, 13 June 2008 15:27 UTC

Return-Path: <p2pi-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: p2pi-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-p2pi-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD153A681E; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:27:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE123A6825 for <p2pi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:27:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.188
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.188 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.061, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZaGCWxLxsDG3 for <p2pi@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (mx2.nic.fr [192.134.4.11]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A91A13A67A4 for <p2pi@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 08:27:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx2.nic.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 7169E1C0158; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:27:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from relay1.nic.fr (relay1.nic.fr [192.134.4.162]) by mx2.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC8B1C011E; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:27:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from bortzmeyer.nic.fr (batilda.nic.fr [192.134.4.69]) by relay1.nic.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60F02A1DA87; Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:27:35 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:27:35 +0200
From: Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzmeyer@nic.fr>
To: "Vijay K. Gurbani" <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com>
Message-ID: <20080613152734.GA25170@nic.fr>
References: <565621476.393261213359293462.JavaMail.root@dkny.pando.com> <4852862D.9030202@telecomitalia.it> <20080613151246.GA20314@nic.fr> <485290D5.1010909@alcatel-lucent.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <485290D5.1010909@alcatel-lucent.com>
X-Operating-System: Debian GNU/Linux lenny/sid
X-Kernel: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 i686
Organization: NIC France
X-URL: http://www.nic.fr/
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Cc: p2pi@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [p2pi] Refining the ALTO problem statement [Was: Re: discussing P2PI-related standardization in Dublin]
X-BeenThere: p2pi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: P2P Infrastructure Discussion <p2pi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/p2pi>
List-Post: <mailto:p2pi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org

On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:23:01AM -0500,
 Vijay K. Gurbani <vkg@alcatel-lucent.com> wrote 
 a message of 34 lines which said:

> I am sorry but could you please expand on "ICS"?

Sorry, Internet Coordinates Systems as in
<http://www.imconf.net/imc-2003/papers/p310-lim11.pdf> or similar
works.
_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi