IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Fri, 10 October 2008 04:14 UTC

Return-Path: <p2pi-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: p2pi-archive@ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-p2pi-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B17C3A69F6; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 21:14:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2pi@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E353A6A07; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.437, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72JPTjNJPEn4; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D33493A69F6; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id E7EDB4230; Thu, 9 Oct 2008 20:41:05 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: "Narayanan, Vidya" <vidyan@qualcomm.com>
References: <20081006203532.B1D673A68AF@core3.amsl.com> <BE82361A0E26874DBC2ED1BA244866B9276373BA@NALASEXMB08.na.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:41:05 -0400
In-Reply-To: <BE82361A0E26874DBC2ED1BA244866B9276373BA@NALASEXMB08.na.qualcomm.com> (Vidya Narayanan's message of "Thu, 9 Oct 2008 17:23:22 -0700")
Message-ID: <tsl3aj546zi.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:14:15 -0700
Cc: "p2pi@ietf.org" <p2pi@ietf.org>, "'iesg@ietf.org'" <iesg@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [p2pi] WG Review: Application-Layer Traffic Optimization (alto)
X-BeenThere: p2pi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: P2P Infrastructure Discussion <p2pi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/p2pi>
List-Post: <mailto:p2pi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi>, <mailto:p2pi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org

I tend to agree with Vidyan's comments.  I think that addressing her
comments regarding a service model instead of a server model is
critical.  While I too am surprised to see a WG review rather than a
second bof, I would not personally object to the work if a reasonable
process is followed in confirming we have sufficient consensus.

_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email