Re: [p2pi] [tana] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter

On Oct 23, 2008, at 12:41 PM, <toby.moncaster@bt.com> <toby.moncaster@bt.com 
 > wrote:
> LETBET doesn't seem to me quite right. It seems to imply the WG would
> only work on a very limited subset of work from its charter.
>
> Having said that I can't think off-hand of a name that does sum things
> up. Was playing round with NASTY (network-aware scavenger transport)  
> but
> that has the same problem as the above. I would love to fit it to
> something like YIELD or GIVEWAY that sums up the idea in its acronym.

I personally liked the suggestion someone else made earlier of "BACK- 
OFF" - meaning "Background Congestion Kontrol of File Flows" or  
something like that, wasn't it...?  (Maybe we could come up with an  
alternate word for the second 'F' that doesn't make it sound so  
narrowly scoped.)

Bryan

>
>
> Toby
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: p2pi-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:p2pi-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of
>> Ingemar Johansson S
>> Sent: 22 October 2008 06:49
>> To: Ted Faber; Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[VZ]
>> Cc: p2pi@ietf.org; tana@ietf.org; TSV Area
>> Subject: Re: [p2pi] [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> Even though I understand that it is better to focus on the charter
> than
>> in the name I too beleieve that TANA does not say much.
>>
>> I believe that somewhere along the track and also in the charter the
>> term "less than best effort transmission" was/is mentioned
>> A possible name would then be
>>
>> LETBET (LEss Than Best Effort Transport)
>>
>> That said... there are a whole bunch of WG names out there that at
>> first
>> glance does not say anything about the group.
>>
>> The charter looks OK from my perspective.
>>
>> /Ingemar
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: tsv-area-bounces@ietf.org
>>> [mailto:tsv-area-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Ted Faber
>>> Sent: den 21 oktober 2008 18:51
>>> To: Eddy, Wesley M. (GRC-RCN0)[VZ]
>>> Cc: TSV Area; tana@ietf.org; p2pi@ietf.org
>>> Subject: Re: [tsv-area] TANA proposed charter
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 09:12:10AM -0500, Eddy, Wesley M.
>>> (GRC-RCN0)[VZ] wrote:
>>>> But if nobody else has a problem with the TANA name, I'll keep my
>>>> mouth shut so we don't waste time and energy.  There are
>>> bigger fish to fry!
>>>
>>> It should change.
>>>
>>> I care about congestion control and nothing in the expansion
>>> of TANA indicated it was about congestion (to me).
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ted Faber
>>> http://www.isi.edu/~faber           PGP:
>>> http://www.isi.edu/~faber/pubkeys.asc
>>> Unexpected attachment on this mail? See
>>> http://www.isi.edu/~faber/FAQ.html#SIG
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> p2pi mailing list
>> p2pi@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi
> _______________________________________________
> tana mailing list
> tana@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tana

_______________________________________________
p2pi mailing list
p2pi@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2pi