IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [P2PSIP] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-p2psip-share-09: (with COMMENT)

"Thomas C. Schmidt" <t.schmidt@haw-hamburg.de> Thu, 03 November 2016 15:13 UTC

Return-Path: <t.schmidt@haw-hamburg.de>
X-Original-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6559C129A8C; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 08:13:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.398
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.398 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7Qef_Laq2oDa; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 08:13:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx6.haw-public.haw-hamburg.de (mx6.haw-public.haw-hamburg.de [141.22.6.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87577129A94; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 08:12:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,587,1473112800"; d="scan'208";a="44275856"
Received: from post.haw-hamburg.de (HELO HUB01.mailcluster.haw-hamburg.de) ([141.22.24.50]) by mail6.is.haw-hamburg.de with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 Nov 2016 16:12:54 +0100
Received: from CAS01.mailcluster.haw-hamburg.de (2002:8d16:183c::8d16:183c) by HUB01.mailcluster.haw-hamburg.de (2002:8d16:1832::8d16:1832) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:12:53 +0100
Received: from [10.134.254.178] (141.22.250.35) by haw-mailer.haw-hamburg.de (141.22.24.60) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Thu, 3 Nov 2016 16:12:53 +0100
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <24cadf5b9faa4e308b95c0313ad36d93@HUB01.mailcluster.haw-hamburg.de>
From: "Thomas C. Schmidt" <t.schmidt@haw-hamburg.de>
Message-ID: <624e2178-de09-c640-19c3-754ed803507e@haw-hamburg.de>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 16:12:36 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <24cadf5b9faa4e308b95c0313ad36d93@HUB01.mailcluster.haw-hamburg.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [141.22.250.35]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/p2psip/-EthCmZp-4MnSXIBpmH7WnQC--Y>
Cc: "draft-ietf-p2psip-share@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-p2psip-share@ietf.org>, "marc@petit-huguenin.org" <marc@petit-huguenin.org>, "rick.casarez@gmail.com" <rick.casarez@gmail.com>, "p2psip@ietf.org" <p2psip@ietf.org>, "p2psip-chairs@ietf.org" <p2psip-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-p2psip-share-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/p2psip/>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2016 15:13:15 -0000

Benoit,

I assume your comment resolves after answering Rick.

Thanks,
  Thomas

On 03.11.2016 13:02, Benoit Claise wrote:
> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-p2psip-share-09: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-p2psip-share/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Below is Rick Casarez's OPS DIR review:
>
> Section 6.5:
> "Since stored values could have been modified or invalidated prior to
> their expiration, an accessing peer SHOULD use a Stat request to check
> for updates prior to using the data cache"
>
> When considering security, and how this works, I would recommend changing
> this to MUST or advising that the lifetime be set very low. A stale ACL
> could allow access were none should occur.
>

-- 

Prof. Dr. Thomas C. Schmidt
° Hamburg University of Applied Sciences                   Berliner Tor 7 °
° Dept. Informatik, Internet Technologies Group    20099 Hamburg, Germany °
° http://www.haw-hamburg.de/inet                   Fon: +49-40-42875-8452 °
° http://www.informatik.haw-hamburg.de/~schmidt    Fax: +49-40-42875-8409 °

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email