[P2PSIP] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-19: (with COMMENT)

"Benoit Claise" <bclaise@cisco.com> Wed, 16 December 2015 20:06 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: p2psip@ietf.org
Delivered-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C91C71A8935; Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:06:40 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.11.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20151216200640.15772.16745.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:06:40 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/p2psip/0DLciwm_S9muCA0biPQHdoKi6RY>
Cc: p2psip-chairs@ietf.org, p2psip@ietf.org, "Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)" <mehmet.ersue@nsn.com>, draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics@ietf.org, Ersue@ietfa.amsl.com
Subject: [P2PSIP] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-19: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/p2psip/>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 20:06:41 -0000

Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-19: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with Ben, Joel & Mehmet (OPS DIR), and Barry.

On top of that, 
- This document looks to me as a specific implementation, written in a
draft format.
- While reading the document, I was wondering: Is this P2P specific or
P2PSIP specific?
Maybe a missed opportunity to have generic OAM principles for P2P, with
RELOAD extension.
- Finally, any connection with LIME, at least on the presentation
aspects.