Re: [P2PSIP] HIP: optional, mandatory?

Erkki Harjula <erkkih@ee.oulu.fi> Mon, 21 January 2008 09:58 UTC

Return-path: <p2psip-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JGtQO-0006EM-Pf; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:58:40 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JGtQM-0006E0-PW for p2psip@ietf.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:58:38 -0500
Received: from ousrvr.oulu.fi ([130.231.240.1] helo=oulu.fi) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JGtQL-0000Id-2C for p2psip@ietf.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 04:58:38 -0500
Received: from paju.oulu.fi (paju.oulu.fi [130.231.240.20]) by oulu.fi (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m0L9wZdn006416; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:58:35 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (paju.oulu.fi [130.231.240.20]) by paju.oulu.fi (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id m0L9wZep010547; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:58:35 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <47946CC9.4080806@ee.oulu.fi>
Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 11:58:33 +0200
From: Erkki Harjula <erkkih@ee.oulu.fi>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: marcin.matuszewski@nokia.com, p2psip@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] HIP: optional, mandatory?
References: <476BA8D9.4010203@ericsson.com><20d2bdfb0712210823m2218c4a6mcace60af3d82db57@mail.gmail.com><476E2B7C.9070601@ericsson.com><20d2bdfb0801081416t41b9b84atb3a147659771036@mail.gmail.com><77F357662F8BFA4CA7074B0410171B6D04049B22@XCH-NW-5V1.nw.nos.boeing.com><7C5B8529-85C9-4977-8C57-34E9041ED1EC@nomadiclab.com><77F357662F8BFA4CA7074B0410171B6D04049B33@XCH-NW-5V1.nw.nos.boeing.com><10DA6CAF-DB5B-4B89-9417-4BEFD816B1E5@cs.columbia.edu><4571B070-0B2F-4076-AAAB-4398295C9E88@cisco.com><465FBE4D-F548-4D7C-855C-10498AF22E6C@quinthar.com><284DBC3B-BF18-400D-8D00-3EB367AEAAA3@cisco.com> <DD40D2FF-809B-4B1F-B43B-0E8F41ED21DB@quinthar.com> <24CCCC428EFEA2469BF046DB3C7A8D223AE531@namail5.corp.adobe.com> <3F18E76823C95E4795181D74BAC7664F05B951F1@esebe102.NOE.Nokia.com>
In-Reply-To: <3F18E76823C95E4795181D74BAC7664F05B951F1@esebe102.NOE.Nokia.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 52e1467c2184c31006318542db5614d5
Cc:
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/p2psip>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: p2psip-bounces@ietf.org

Hi, we at the University of Oulu are collaborating with Nokia and 
Columbia University with the P2PP prototype. Together with Nokia we are 
implementing a mobile version (works on Nokia's S60 phones) of P2PP 
prototype, which is able to act as both P2PSIP peer and client. We are 
currently working on mobile version's interoperability with fixed 
version of P2PP, aiming to provide full compatibility between them.

Columbia's overlay on PlanetLab provides an excellent testing 
environment for the prototypes. Thus, I also encourage you to join this 
P2PP trial network to increase the node population.

-Erkki


marcin.matuszewski@nokia.com wrote:
> I fully agree. Besides Nokia's implementation shows that P2PP can also
> work on mobile devices. Some of you who visited Nokia's P2PSIP demo
> stand in Las Vegas could see a demo of the P2PP implementation on Nokia
> phones. At the stand we were showing how a mobile phone that implements
> P2PP can join the Columbia Univ.'s 600 nodes overlay on Planet Lab and
> allow users to use basic SIP services. The demo was done in colaboration
> with Columbia Univ. 
> Everyone who whould like to join the P2PP trial network please send an
> email to Salman, Henning or me.
>  
> Our goal is to specify a protocol based on our implementation
> experience. It is very easy to write protocol specifications that are
> difficult to implement and therefore have high chances to fail in the
> market, what we could see in the past. 
>
> Marcin 
>   
>




_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
P2PSIP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip