RE: [P2PSIP] HIP: optional, mandatory?

"Henry Sinnreich" <hsinnrei@adobe.com> Tue, 22 January 2008 15:30 UTC

Return-path: <p2psip-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHL54-0003dv-Sh; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:30:30 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHL53-0003dh-Vs for p2psip@ietf.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:30:30 -0500
Received: from exprod6og107.obsmtp.com ([64.18.1.208]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHL53-0007GO-Es for p2psip@ietf.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:30:29 -0500
Received: from source ([192.150.20.142]) by exprod6ob107.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:30:16 PST
Received: from inner-relay-3.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-3b [10.128.4.236]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m0MFUDGb018188; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:30:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fe1.corp.adobe.com (fe1.corp.adobe.com [10.8.192.70]) by inner-relay-3.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m0MFU8FV014380; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:30:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from namail5.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.192.88]) by fe1.corp.adobe.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:30:08 -0800
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [P2PSIP] HIP: optional, mandatory?
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 07:29:59 -0800
Message-ID: <24CCCC428EFEA2469BF046DB3C7A8D223AE562@namail5.corp.adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: <4795F8A9.9090206@telecomitalia.it>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [P2PSIP] HIP: optional, mandatory?
Thread-Index: Achc/81qfVF32UzhRmudgRKC0cbLWwACy4iw
References: <476BA8D9.4010203@ericsson.com><20d2bdfb0712210823m2218c4a6mcace60af3d82db57@mail.gmail.com><476E2B7C.9070601@ericsson.com><20d2bdfb0801081416t41b9b84atb3a147659771036@mail.gmail.com><77F357662F8BFA4CA7074B0410171B6D04049B22@XCH-NW-5V1.nw.nos.boeing.com><7C5B8529-85C9-4977-8C57-34E9041ED1EC@nomadiclab.com><77F357662F8BFA4CA7074B0410171B6D04049B33@XCH-NW-5V1.nw.nos.boeing.com><10DA6CAF-DB5B-4B89-9417-4BEFD816B1E5@cs.columbia.edu><4571B070-0B2F-4076-AAAB-4398295C9E88@cisco.com><465FBE4D-F548-4D7C-855C-10498AF22E6C@quinthar.com><284DBC3B-BF18-400D-8D00-3EB367AEAAA3@cisco.com> <DD40D2FF-809B-4B1F-B43B-0E8F41ED21DB@quinthar.com> <24CCCC428EFEA2469BF046DB3C7A8D223AE531@namail5.corp.adobe.com> <3F18E76823C95E4795181D74BAC7664F05B951F1@esebe102.NOE.Nokia.com> <4795A323.3080401@telecomitalia.it> <C4CA168C-0627-4EB9-818F-C88A4826412E@cs.columbia.edu> <4795F8A9.9090206@telecomitalia.it>
From: Henry Sinnreich <hsinnrei@adobe.com>
To: Enrico Marocco <enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it>, marcin.matuszewski@nokia.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2008 15:30:08.0033 (UTC) FILETIME=[AB518910:01C85D0B]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 69a74e02bbee44ab4f8eafdbcedd94a1
Cc: p2psip@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/p2psip>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: p2psip-bounces@ietf.org

Enrico,

>So, if I understand correctly, Marcin's mobile devices connect directly
>to P2PP peers running on PlanetLab nodes without effectively being part
>of PlanetLab, establishing an overlay made of both PL and non-PL nodes,

The mobile devices run the _client protocol_ that has been the topic of
many discussions on this list.

Maybe Marcin can give us the reference to the latest description of the
client protocol for P2PP implemented for this trial. 

Thanks, Henry

-----Original Message-----
From: Enrico Marocco [mailto:enrico.marocco@telecomitalia.it] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 6:08 AM
To: Henning Schulzrinne
Cc: marcin.matuszewski@nokia.com; Henry Sinnreich; p2psip@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] HIP: optional, mandatory?

Henning Schulzrinne wrote:
> PlanetLab is many things, but stable is not the adjective I would
use...
> These are generally servers run on a volunteer basis by graduate
> students in various university labs; they routinely get disconnected,
> crash or get overloaded with other experiments.
> 
> Relative to consumer nodes, they do tend to have public IP addresses.

So, if I understand correctly, Marcin's mobile devices connect directly
to P2PP peers running on PlanetLab nodes without effectively being part
of PlanetLab, establishing an overlay made of both PL and non-PL nodes,
right?

-- 
Ciao,
Enrico

_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
P2PSIP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip