RE: [P2PSIP] HIP: optional, mandatory?

"Henry Sinnreich" <hsinnrei@adobe.com> Tue, 22 January 2008 19:06 UTC

Return-path: <p2psip-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHOS5-0005Vd-P1; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:06:29 -0500
Received: from [10.90.34.44] (helo=chiedprmail1.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHOS4-0005VS-LW for p2psip@ietf.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:06:28 -0500
Received: from exprod6og105.obsmtp.com ([64.18.1.189]) by chiedprmail1.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JHOS4-0006PI-2r for p2psip@ietf.org; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 14:06:28 -0500
Received: from source ([192.150.20.142]) by exprod6ob105.postini.com ([64.18.5.12]) with SMTP; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:06:23 PST
Received: from inner-relay-3.eur.adobe.com (inner-relay-3b [10.128.4.236]) by outbound-smtp-2.corp.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id m0MJ6JGb024473; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:06:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fe2.corp.adobe.com (fe2.corp.adobe.com [10.8.192.72]) by inner-relay-3.eur.adobe.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id m0MJ6IFV007083; Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:06:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from namail5.corp.adobe.com ([10.8.192.88]) by fe2.corp.adobe.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:06:17 -0800
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [P2PSIP] HIP: optional, mandatory?
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:06:13 -0800
Message-ID: <24CCCC428EFEA2469BF046DB3C7A8D223AE56F@namail5.corp.adobe.com>
In-Reply-To: <4796159C.4090203@ee.oulu.fi>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [P2PSIP] HIP: optional, mandatory?
Thread-Index: AchdEWofpP0YhQBCQB6vQDy7qngwKQAF0EIg
References: <476BA8D9.4010203@ericsson.com><20d2bdfb0712210823m2218c4a6mcace60af3d82db57@mail.gmail.com><476E2B7C.9070601@ericsson.com><20d2bdfb0801081416t41b9b84atb3a147659771036@mail.gmail.com><77F357662F8BFA4CA7074B0410171B6D04049B22@XCH-NW-5V1.nw.nos.boeing.com><7C5B8529-85C9-4977-8C57-34E9041ED1EC@nomadiclab.com><77F357662F8BFA4CA7074B0410171B6D04049B33@XCH-NW-5V1.nw.nos.boeing.com><10DA6CAF-DB5B-4B89-9417-4BEFD816B1E5@cs.columbia.edu><4571B070-0B2F-4076-AAAB-4398295C9E88@cisco.com><465FBE4D-F548-4D7C-855C-10498AF22E6C@quinthar.com><284DBC3B-BF18-400D-8D00-3EB367AEAAA3@cisco.com> <DD40D2FF-809B-4B1F-B43B-0E8F41ED21DB@quinthar.com> <24CCCC428EFEA2469BF046DB3C7A8D223AE531@namail5.corp.adobe.com> <3F18E76823C95E4795181D74BAC7664F05B951F1@esebe102.NOE.Nokia.com> <4795A323.3080401@telecomitalia.it> <C4CA168C-0627-4EB9-818F-C88A4826412E@cs.columbia.edu> <4795F8A9.9090206@telecomitalia.it> <24CCCC428EFEA2469BF046DB3C7A8D223AE562@namail5.corp.adobe.com> <4796159C.4090203@ee.oulu.fi>
From: "Henry Sinnreich" <hsinnrei@adobe.com>
To: "Erkki Harjula" <erkkih@ee.oulu.fi>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Jan 2008 19:06:17.0749 (UTC) FILETIME=[DDDF2450:01C85D29]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 52e1467c2184c31006318542db5614d5
Cc: p2psip@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/p2psip>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: p2psip-bounces@ietf.org

> we are currently implementing the _peer_ prototype at the Univ. 
> of Oulu. At the moment it is based on the older version of P2PP, and
we 
> are currently converting it to P2PP version -01.

It is very encouraging to see one more organization contributing to
deploying and testing a P2PSIP protocol that has the benefits of free
code, deployment experience, peer review and continued enhancements from
various sources.

This may or may not have been a requirement in the WG charter, but makes
many of us comfortable the emerging P2PSIP standard may be based on all
these benefits coming from cooperation in the IETF.

Henry

-----Original Message-----
From: Erkki Harjula [mailto:erkkih@ee.oulu.fi] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2008 8:11 AM
To: Henry Sinnreich
Cc: p2psip@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] HIP: optional, mandatory?


Henry Sinnreich wrote:
> The mobile devices run the _client protocol_ that has been the topic 
> of many discussions on this list.
Actually we are currently implementing the _peer_ prototype at the Univ.

of Oulu. At the moment it is based on the older version of P2PP, and we 
are currently converting it to P2PP version -01. The next goal is the 
integration with Nokia's client version (which was demonstrated in CCNC)

and Salman's new prototype implementation.

-Erkki

_______________________________________________
P2PSIP mailing list
P2PSIP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip