[P2PSIP] Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-19: (with COMMENT)

"Brian Haberman" <brian@innovationslab.net> Wed, 16 December 2015 14:31 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20151216143118.10303.5234.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 2015 06:31:18 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/p2psip/BiR0Ycl4ac3qhhDi2qlZnrKP8Ok>
Cc: p2psip-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics@ietf.org, p2psip@ietf.org
Subject: [P2PSIP] Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-19: (with COMMENT)

Brian Haberman has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics-19: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-p2psip-diagnostics/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I agree with Ben and Barry that the "Updates RFC 6940" is not
well-justified.  I also agree with Joel that the readability makes it
hard to completely understand what is being proposed.

[P2PSIP] Brian Haberman's No Objection on draft-i… Brian Haberman