Re: [P2PSIP] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-p2psip-share-09: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 24 November 2016 15:41 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: p2psip@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C293E129461; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 07:41:31 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -16.019
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-16.019 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s-4182EFNIEx; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 07:41:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aer-iport-4.cisco.com (aer-iport-4.cisco.com [173.38.203.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09CA3129646; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 07:32:54 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1482; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1480001575; x=1481211175; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date: mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gt5x74+Mc96S91BozjQF4Ky3B8571LrUILNseCyp5G8=; b=Z0RsENOcN4K1O+So5fWS51ibPUe12IAlWJk95qTaI/VwvAiUSAy1ggjR GmgmVRvZuZMNmp2lSpoHplr5KFGbTXER5RtMQ1vWooxwlGHVPRkEv2fUp s4OdFZXWqvo5Gx7mMnuv2arJ7JDr7cA9DSymwG1u+aXGKa0Y4GCqUei37 k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0CdAQAsBzdY/xbLJq1eGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBgzgBAQEBAXctVY1AlxuSZoIOgggohXkCgjEUAQIBAQEBAQEBYii?= =?us-ascii?q?EaQEBBDhBEAsYLlcGAQwIAQGIaQ6wSYtVAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEYB?= =?us-ascii?q?YY+gX2CXoQRChEBhX0BBIhZkXuGSIo+gXKEd4MehiuKEYNghAweN14XEwyFUj0?= =?us-ascii?q?0AYYYgi4BAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.31,543,1473120000"; d="scan'208";a="650186999"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-4.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 24 Nov 2016 15:32:52 +0000
Received: from [10.60.67.88] (ams-bclaise-8917.cisco.com [10.60.67.88]) by aer-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id uAOFWqn3026583; Thu, 24 Nov 2016 15:32:52 GMT
To: "Thomas C. Schmidt" <t.schmidt@haw-hamburg.de>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <24cadf5b9faa4e308b95c0313ad36d93@HUB01.mailcluster.haw-hamburg.de> <624e2178-de09-c640-19c3-754ed803507e@haw-hamburg.de>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <4590bbbb-e896-02ea-42c3-39558a28f41e@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 16:32:52 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <624e2178-de09-c640-19c3-754ed803507e@haw-hamburg.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/p2psip/KQWYjv7ydRLj7yypSbMqxu_Swok>
Cc: "draft-ietf-p2psip-share@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-p2psip-share@ietf.org>, "marc@petit-huguenin.org" <marc@petit-huguenin.org>, "rick.casarez@gmail.com" <rick.casarez@gmail.com>, "p2psip@ietf.org" <p2psip@ietf.org>, "p2psip-chairs@ietf.org" <p2psip-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [P2PSIP] Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-p2psip-share-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: p2psip@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Peer-to-Peer SIP working group discussion list <p2psip.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/p2psip/>
List-Post: <mailto:p2psip@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/p2psip>, <mailto:p2psip-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 15:41:32 -0000

On 11/3/2016 4:12 PM, Thomas C. Schmidt wrote:
> Benoit,
>
> I assume your comment resolves after answering Rick.
Yes, thanks.

Regards, Benoit
>
> Thanks,
>  Thomas
>
> On 03.11.2016 13:02, Benoit Claise wrote:
>> Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-p2psip-share-09: No Objection
>>
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>>
>>
>> Please refer to 
>> https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>>
>>
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-p2psip-share/
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Below is Rick Casarez's OPS DIR review:
>>
>> Section 6.5:
>> "Since stored values could have been modified or invalidated prior to
>> their expiration, an accessing peer SHOULD use a Stat request to check
>> for updates prior to using the data cache"
>>
>> When considering security, and how this works, I would recommend 
>> changing
>> this to MUST or advising that the lifetime be set very low. A stale ACL
>> could allow access were none should occur.
>>
>